+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of a standardized procedure for [corrected] microscopic cell counts [corrected] in body fluids

Evaluation of a standardized procedure for [corrected] microscopic cell counts [corrected] in body fluids

Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis 19(6): 267-275

A standardized urinalysis and manual microscopic cell counting system was evaluated for its potential to reduce intra- and interoperator variability in urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cell counts. Replicate aliquots of pooled specimens were submitted blindly to technologists who were instructed to use either the Kova system with the disposable Glasstic slide (Hycor Biomedical, Inc., Garden Grove, CA) or the standard operating procedure of the University of California-Irvine (UCI), which uses plain glass slides for urine sediments and hemacytometers for CSF. The Hycor system provides a mechanical means of obtaining a fixed volume of fluid in which to resuspend the sediment, and fixes the volume of specimen to be microscopically examined by using capillary filling of a chamber containing in-plane counting grids. Ninety aliquots of pooled specimens of each type of body fluid were used to assess the inter- and intraoperator reproducibility of the measurements. The variability of replicate Hycor measurements made on a single specimen by the same or different observers was compared with that predicted by a Poisson distribution. The Hycor methods generally resulted in test statistics that were slightly lower than those obtained with the laboratory standard methods, indicating a trend toward decreasing the effects of various sources of variability. For 15 paired aliquots of each body fluid, tests for systematically higher or lower measurements with the Hycor methods were performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Also examined was the average difference between the Hycor and current laboratory standard measurements, along with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the true average difference. Without increasing labor or the requirement for attention to detail, the Hycor method provides slightly better interrater comparisons than the current method used at UCI.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048994036

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16302213

DOI: 10.1002/jcla.20089

Related references

Standardized uptake values of FDG corrected for the body surface area are less dependent on the body size than SUVs corrected for the body weight. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 34(5 Suppl. ): 73P, 1993

Whole-body-Pet in clinical oncology Comparison of attenuation-corrected and non-corrected images. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 38(5 Suppl. ): 198P, 1997

Standardized procedure for presenting corrected Fe (sub 2) O (sub 3) / FeO ratios in analyses of fine grained mafic rocks. Neues Jahrbuch fuer Mineralogie Monatshefte, 1979

Formula corrected maximal standardized uptake value in FDG-PET for partial volume effect and motion artifact is not a prognostic factor in stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 29(8): 666-673, 2015

Characterization of the immunodeficiency of RIIS/J [corrected] mice. I. Association with the CD5 (LY-1) [corrected] B cell lineage. Journal of Immunology 142(6): 1813-1817, 1989

The difference among stress and rest normal reference databases using non-corrected, scatter corrected, and scatter with attenuation corrected Bull's eye myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in both genders. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 88(Suppl. 4): S235-S241, 2005

Do we need fractionation-corrected doses in sequential two-phase treatments? A quantification of dose differences between non-corrected and corrected combined non-uniform dose distributions in normal tissue. Acta Oncologica 49(8): 1253-1260, 2010

TRIB3 [corrected] is implicated in glucotoxicity- and endoplasmic reticulum-stress-induced [corrected] beta-cell apoptosis. Journal of Endocrinology 199(3): 407-416, 2008

Tissue MMP-2 and MMP-9 [corrected] are better prognostic factors than serum MMP-2/TIMP-2--complex or TIMP-1 [corrected] in stage [corrected] I-III lung carcinoma. Cancer Letters 236(1): 125-132, 2006

Pancreatic islets induce CD4(+) [corrected] CD25(-)Foxp3(+) [corrected] T-cell regulated tolerance to HY-mismatched skin grafts. Transplantation 86(10): 1352-1360, 2008

Glucose corrected standardized uptake value (SUVgluc) in the evaluation of brain lesions with 18F-FDG PET. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 40(7): 997, 2013

Comparison of attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected whole-body FDG PET images in 300 patients with lung cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 41(5 Suppl ): 76P, 2000

Determination of aluminium in human tissues and body fluids by Zeeman-corrected atomic absorption spectrometry. Analyst 111(6): 657-660, 1986

An evaluation of P wave dispersion, QT, corrected QT and corrected QT dispersion intervals on the electrocardiograms of malnourished adults. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 38(1): 122-127, 2010

Liver standardized uptake value corrected for lean body mass at FDG PET/CT: effect of FDG uptake time. Clinical Nuclear Medicine 40(1): E17-E22, 2015