+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Evaluation of an algorithmic approach to pediatric back pain

Evaluation of an algorithmic approach to pediatric back pain

Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 26(3): 353-357

Pediatric patients require a systematic approach to treating back pain that minimizes the number of diagnostic studies without missing specific diagnoses. This study reviews an algorithm for the evaluation of pediatric back pain and assesses critical factors in the history and physical examination that are predictive of specific diagnoses. Eighty-seven pediatric patients with thoracic and/or lumbar back pain were treated utilizing after this algorithm. If initial plain radiographs were positive, patients were considered to have a specific diagnosis. If negative, patients with constant pain, night pain, radicular pain, and/or an abnormal neurological examination obtained a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with negative radiographs and intermittent pain were diagnosed with nonspecific back pain. Twenty-one (24%) of 87 patients had positive radiographs and were treated for their specific diagnoses. Nineteen (29%) of 66 patients with negative radiographs had constant pain, night pain, radicular pain, and/or an abnormal neurological examination. Ten of these 19 patients had a specific diagnosis determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, 31 (36%) of 87 patients had a specific diagnosis. Back pain of other 56 patients was of a nonspecific nature. No specific diagnoses were missed at latest follow-up. Specificity for determining a specific diagnosis was very high for radicular pain (100%), abnormal neurological examination (100%), and night pain (95%). Radicular pain and an abnormal neurological examination also had high positive predictive value (100%). Lumbar pain was the most sensitive (67%) and had the highest negative predictive value (75%). This algorithm seems to be an effective tool for diagnosing pediatric back pain, and this should help to reduce costs and patient/family anxiety and to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 048994346

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16670548

DOI: 10.1097/01.bpo.0000214928.25809.f9

Related references

Low back pain: the algorithmic approach. Comprehensive Therapy 17(6): 22-27, 1991

An algorithmic approach for clinical management of low back pain. Neurology India 64(5): 950-957, 2018

Low back pain: an algorithmic approach to diagnosis and management. Geriatrics 53(10): 26-8 33-6 39-40 Passim, 1998

Low back pain in children and adolescents: an algorithmic clinical approach. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics 21(3): 259-270, 2011

An algorithmic programming approach for back pain symptoms in failed back surgery syndrome using spinal cord stimulation with a multicolumn surgically implanted epidural lead: a multicenter international prospective study. Pain Practice 15(3): 195-207, 2015

Evaluation of a systematic approach to pediatric back pain: the utility of magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics 35(1): 28-32, 2015

Evaluation and management of hip pain: an algorithmic approach. Journal of Family Practice 52(8): 607-617, 2003

Evaluation of quality of life and neuropathic pain in patients with low back pain using the Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. European Spine Journal 24(3): 503-512, 2015

Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, Low Back Outcome Score and revised Oswestry low back pain disability scale for patients with low back pain due to degenerative disc disease: evaluation of Polish versions. Spine 36(26): E1722, 2011

Approach to the pediatric athlete with back pain: more than just the pars. Physician and Sportsmedicine 43(4): 421-431, 2015

A multidisciplinary approach to pediatric back pain: characteristics and outcomes. The Journal of Pain 17(4): S106-S107, 2016

Evaluation of back pain in the pediatric athlete. Chiropractic Sports Medicine 2(1): 3-7, 1988

Interventional pain management for phantom limb pain: An algorithmic approach. Techniques in Regional Anesthesia and Pain Management 16(4): 201-204, 2012

An Algorithmic Approach to Operative Management of Complex Pediatric Dog Bites: 3-Year Review of a Level I Regional Referral Pediatric Trauma Hospital. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. Global Open 5(10): E1431, 2017

A novel back school using a multidisciplinary team approach featuring quantitative functional evaluation and therapeutic exercises for patients with chronic low back pain: the Japanese experience in the general setting. Spine 30(10): 1219-1225, 2005