+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?



High click stimulus repetition rate in the auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients with normal MRI. Does it improve diagnosis?



Revue de Laryngologie - Otologie - Rhinologie 125(3): 151-155



The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients were qualitatively different from a normal population. This study analysed 69 subjects, separated into two groups; a control group composed of 20 females and 20 males; and an MS group composed of 20 females and 9 males. The controls had no history of neurological or otorhinolaryngological disorders. All MS patients presented a normal magnetic resonance imaging of the brainstem. A definite diagnosis of MS was given according to Poser's criteria for MS research protocols (1983). The following parameters were used in the study of the ABR of each subject: 2000 clicks of 100 ms at 60 dB equivalent peak of sou nd pressure level (pe SPL) above the psycho-acoustic threshold, obtained with the subject's response to clicks. Both ears were initially stimulated at 11 clicks/s, and then with clicks of same intensity, but with a progressive increase of the stimulus rate to 31, 51, 61 and 71 clicks/s. The analysis of variance with independent factors and repeated measures was used in the statistical analysis of the comparison between group results. The absolute latency of wave III was statistically greater, with a stimulus rate of 51 and 61 clicks/s, in the MS group. The males in the MS group presented a statistically greater absolute latency of wave V with the use of 51 and 61 clicks/s. With stimulus rates above 30 clicks/s, the absolute latency of wave V was also greater for MS females. There were statistically significant differences in the interpeak interval I - III of the control group compared to the MS group, for stimulus rates of 51 and 61 clicks/s, in females and for the stimulus rate of 61 clicks/s in males. This interval was higher in the MS group with these stimulus rates. The results suggest the inclusion of stimulus rates of 51 and 61 clicks/s in the ABR tests of subjects with clinical suspicion of demyelinating diseases like MS.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 049217927

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15605430


Related references

Contribution of changes in click rate and intensity on diagnosis of multiple sclerosis by brainstem auditory evoked potentials. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 65(6): 570-585, 1982

The indication for brain stem evoked response and the effect of click rate and stimulus intensity on the latencies of the auditory evoked potentials. Laryngologie Rhinologie Otologie 59(10): 690-697, 1980

Middle latency auditory evoked potentials improve the detection of abnormalities along auditory pathways in multiple sclerosis patients. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 84(3): 296-299, 1992

Visual evoked potentials and click-evoked brainstem potentials in early diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: statistics. Der Nervenarzt 53(6): 327-332, 1982

Auditory double click evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 59(2-3): 96-107, 1979

Brain stem auditory evoked potentials subcomponents and waveform relation to click phase and stimulus rate. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 65(1): 72-80, 1986

Binaural click lateralization evidence from psychophysics and brainstem evoked potentials in normal subjects and multiple sclerosis patients. Cazals, Y , K Horner And L Demany (Ed ) Advances in The Biosciences, Vol 83 Auditory Physiology And Perception; 9th International Symposium on Hearing, Carcens, France, June 9-14, 1991 Xvii+655p Pergamon Press: Oxford, England, Uk; New York, New York, Usa Illus 635-641, 1992

The stability of the auditory evoked potentials in normal man and patients with multiple sclerosis. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 36(1): 147-156, 1978

Effects of stimulus intensity and repetition rate on brain stem auditory evoked potentials baeps in awake monkey. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 14(2): 1183, 1988

The effect of the click repetition rate on the latency of the auditory evoked brain stem response and its clinical use for a neurological diagnosis. Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 222(2): 91-96, 1979

Effects of stimulus intensity and repetition rate on brainstem auditory evoked potentials in awake squirrel monkey saimiri sciureus. Psychophysiology 25(4): 474, 1988

Magnetic stimulation motor evoked potential in multiple sclerosis. Comparison with visual evoked potentials, brain stem auditory evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials. Zhonghua Shen Jing Jing Shen Ke Za Zhi 25(3): 130-2 189, 1992

The influence of click phase and rate upon latencies and latency distributions of the normal brain-stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 57(6): 561-570, 1984

The influence of click phase and rate on latencies and latency distributions of normal brain stem auditory evoked potentials. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology 57(6): 561-570, 1984

Blink reflexes elicited by electrical, acoustic and visual stimuli. II. Their relation to visual-evoked potentials and auditory brain stem evoked potentials in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. European Neurology 21(4): 264-269, 1982