+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors



Image quality in two phosphor-based flat panel digital radiographic detectors



Medical Physics 30(7): 1747-1757



Two general types of phosphor screens are currently used in indirect digital radiographic systems: structured phosphor screens and turbid phosphor screens. The purpose of the study was to experimentally compare the image quality characteristics of two flat-panel digital radiography detectors with similar electronics and pixel sizes (0.127 mm), but otherwise equipped with the two types of screens (0.6-mm-thick structured CsI and Lanex Regular). The presampled modulation transfer functions (MTFs) of the detectors were assessed using an edge method. The noise power spectra (NPS) were measured by two-dimensional Fourier analysis of uniformly-exposed radiographs at 50-100 kVp with 19 mm added Al filtration. The detective quantum efficiencies (DQEs) were assessed from the MTF, the NPS, and estimates of the ideal signal-to-noise ratio. The MTF measures of the two detectors were generally similar above a spatial frequency of 2 mm(-1), with approximately 2.5 and approximately 3.8 mm(-1) spatial frequencies corresponding to 0.2 MTF and 0.1 MTF, respectively. Below 2 mm(-1), the MTF for the CsI-based detector was slightly higher by an average of 0.07. At 70 kVp, the measured DQE values in the diagonal (and axial) direction(s) at spatial frequencies of 0.15 mm(-1) and 2.5 mm(-1) were 78% (78%) and 26% (20%) for the CsI-based detector, and 20% (20%) and 7% (6%) for the Lanex-based detector, respectively. The comparative findings experimentally confirm that in indirect flat-panel detectors, structured phosphor screens provide a more favorable tradeoff between resolution and noise compared to turbid-phosphor screens, effectively increasing the detection efficiency of the detector without a negative impact on the detector's spatial resolution response.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049283668

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12906192

DOI: 10.1118/1.1578772


Related references

Flat panel digital radiography compared with storage phosphor computed radiography: assessment of dose versus image quality in phantom studies. Investigative Radiology 37(11): 609-614, 2002

Effect on image data resampling in evaluation of the basic imaging properties for a digital radiographic system based on a flat panel detector. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 63(7): 749-756, 2007

Investigation of image quality identification utilizing physical image quality measurement in direct- and indirect-type of flat panel detectors and computed radiography. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 67(11): 1415-1425, 2012

The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography. Clinical Radiology 63(10): 1073-1085, 2008

Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study. Radiographics 18(3): 745-754, 1998

Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy. Medical Physics 29(7): 1611-1621, 2002

Reducing dose in urography while maintaining image quality-a comparison of storage phosphor plates and a flat-panel detector. European Radiology 16(1): 221-226, 2005

Investigation of the effect of anode/filter materials on the dose and image quality of a digital mammography system based on an amorphous selenium flat panel detector. British Journal of Radiology 83(988): 290-295, 2010

Measurement of focal spot size with slit camera using computed radiography and flat-panel based digital detectors. Medical Physics 30(7): 1768-1775, 2003

Measurements of the modulation transfer function, normalized noise power spectrum and detective quantum efficiency for two flat panel detectors: a fluoroscopic and a cone beam computer tomography flat panel detectors. Journal of X-Ray Science and Technology 17(4): 279-293, 2010

Digital chest radiography with a selenium-based flat-panel detector versus a storage phosphor system: comparison of soft-copy images. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 175(4): 1013-1018, 2000

Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector. Acta Radiologica. Supplementum 43(427): 1-43, 2002

Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. Medical Physics 30(2): 254-263, 2003

AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more. Radiographics 31(2): 591-602, 2011

Investigation of the accurate measurement of the basic imaging properties for the digital radiographic system based on flat panel detector. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 64(7): 877-878, 2008