+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study

A prospective international observational prevalence study on prone positioning of ARDS patients: the APRONET (ARDS Prone Position Network) study

Intensive Care Medicine 44(1): 22-37

While prone positioning (PP) has been shown to improve patient survival in moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, the rate of application of PP in clinical practice still appears low. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of use of PP in ARDS patients (primary endpoint), the physiological effects of PP, and the reasons for not using it (secondary endpoints). The APRONET study was a prospective international 1-day prevalence study performed four times in April, July, and October 2016 and January 2017. On each study day, investigators in each ICU had to screen every patient. For patients with ARDS, use of PP, gas exchange, ventilator settings and plateau pressure (Pplat) were recorded before and at the end of the PP session. Complications of PP and reasons for not using PP were also documented. Values are presented as median (1st-3rd quartiles). Over the study period, 6723 patients were screened in 141 ICUs from 20 countries (77% of the ICUs were European), of whom 735 had ARDS and were analyzed. Overall 101 ARDS patients had at least one session of PP (13.7%), with no differences among the 4 study days. The rate of PP use was 5.9% (11/187), 10.3% (41/399) and 32.9% (49/149) in mild, moderate and severe ARDS, respectively (P = 0.0001). The duration of the first PP session was 18 (16-23) hours. Measured with the patient in the supine position before and at the end of the first PP session, PaO2/FIO2 increased from 101 (76-136) to 171 (118-220) mmHg (P = 0.0001) driving pressure decreased from 14 [11-17] to 13 [10-16] cmH2O (P = 0.001), and Pplat decreased from 26 [23-29] to 25 [23-28] cmH2O (P = 0.04). The most prevalent reason for not using PP (64.3%) was that hypoxemia was not considered sufficiently severe. Complications were reported in 12 patients (11.9%) in whom PP was used (pressure sores in five, hypoxemia in two, endotracheal tube-related in two ocular in two, and a transient increase in intracranial pressure in one). In conclusion, this prospective international prevalence study found that PP was used in 32.9% of patients with severe ARDS, and was associated with low complication rates, significant increase in oxygenation and a significant decrease in driving pressure.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049292766

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 29218379

DOI: 10.1007/s00134-017-4996-5

Related references

Prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome after abdominal surgery: a multicenter retrospective study : SAPRONADONF (Study of Ards and PRONe position After abDOmiNal surgery in France). Annals of Intensive Care 7(1): 21, 2017

The oxygenation variations related to prone positioning during mechanical ventilation: a clinical comparison between ARDS and non-ARDS hypoxemic patients. Intensive Care Medicine 27(8): 1352-1359, 2001

The prone position in ARDS patients. A clinical study. Chest 94(1): 103-107, 1988

Patients with severe ARDS already positioned prone: why don't we leave them in the prone position during transport and CT scan?. Minerva Anestesiologica 82(6): 720-721, 2018

Prevalence of prone position use and complications among ventilated ARDS patients. Intensive Care Medicine 44(3): 397-398, 2018

Does volatile sedation with sevoflurane allow spontaneous breathing during prolonged prone positioning in intubated ARDS patients? A retrospective observational feasibility trial. Annals of Intensive Care 9(1): 41, 2019

Incomplete (135°) prone position as an alternative to full prone position for lung recruitment in ARDS during ECMO therapy. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 127(3-4): 149-150, 2015

Feasibility and effectiveness of prone position in morbidly obese patients with ARDS: a case-control clinical study. Chest 143(6): 1554-1561, 2013

Prone positioning for patients with ARDS. Nurse Practitioner 38(6): 10-12, 2013

Short-term effects of combining upright and prone positions in patients with ARDS: a prospective randomized study. Critical Care 15(5): R230, 2012

A turn for the better: 'prone positioning' of patients with ARDS. American Journal of Nursing 101(5): 26-34; Quiz 34-5, 2001

Impact of statin therapy on mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) depends on ARDS severity: a prospective observational cohort study. Bmc Medicine 13: 128, 2015

CE Credit: A Turn for the Better: 'Prone Positioning' of Patients with ARDS. Ajn American Journal of Nursing 101(5): 26-35, 2001

Influence of support on intra-abdominal pressure, hepatic kinetics of indocyanine green and extravascular lung water during prone positioning in patients with ARDS: a randomized crossover study. Critical Care 9(3): R251-R257, 2005

Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Pressure Among 3 Prone Positional Apparatuses After Changing From the Supine to the Prone Position and Applying Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Healthy Euvolemic Patients: A Prospective Observational Study. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology 29(1): 14-20, 2015