+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs



It Ain't Necessarily So: The Electronic Health Record And The Unlikely Prospect Of Reducing Health Care Costs



Health Affairs 25(4): 1079-1085



Electronic health record (EHR) advocates argue that EHRs lead to reduced errors and reduced costs. Many reports suggest otherwise. The EHR often leads to higher billings and declines in provider productivity with no change in provider-to-patient ratios. Error reduction is inconsistent and has yet to be linked to savings or malpractice premiums. As interest in patient-centeredness, shared decision making, teaming, group visits, open access, and accountability grows, the EHR is better viewed as an insufficient yet necessary ingredient. Absent other fundamental interventions that alter medical practice, it is unlikely that the U.S. health care bill will decline as a result of the EHR alone.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049425912

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16835189

DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.4.1079


Related references

Reducing the costs of U.S. health care: the role of electronic health records. Annals of Internal Medicine 159(2): 151-152, 2013

Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs 24(5): 1103-1117, 2005

Lessons from the central Hampshire electronic health record pilot project: evaluation of the electronic health record for supporting patient care and secondary analysis. BMJ 328(7444): 875-878, 2004

Impact of an Electronic Health Record-Integrated Personal Health Record on Patient Participation in Health Care: Development and Randomized Controlled Trial of MyHealthKeeper. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(12): E401, 2018

Reducing health care costs by reducing the need and demand for medical services. The Health Project Consortium. New England Journal of Medicine 329(5): 321-325, 1993

Electronic health record donations by laboratories: Is legal necessarily ethical?. Yearbook of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine 2013: 315-316, 2013

Electronic health record donations by laboratories: is legal necessarily ethical?. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 66(3): 474-478, 2012

Evidence suggesting that health education for self-management in patients with chronic arthritis has sustained health benefits while reducing health care costs. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 36(4): 439-446, 1993

Electronic Health Record Adoption - Maybe It's not about the Money: Physician Super-Users, Electronic Health Records and Patient Care. Applied Clinical Informatics 2(4): 460-471, 2011

Extended use of electronic health records by primary care physicians: Does the electronic health record artefact matter?. Health Informatics Journal 2017: 1460458217704244, 2017

Ensuring Continuity of Care Through Electronic Health Records: Recommendations From the ASCO Electronic Health Record Roundtable. Journal of Oncology Practice 3(3): 137-142, 2007

Improving the quality of care and reducing health care costs through a point-of-service health care information system. Managed Care Quarterly 3(4): 84-90, 1996

Triple Aim in Kinzigtal, Germany Improving population health, integrating health care and reducing costs of care – lessons for the UK?. 2012

The SSM Health Care approach to achieving "True North": improving health care quality while reducing costs. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 87(8): 729-731, 2012

Health information technology: revisions to the 2014 edition electronic health record certification criteria; and Medicare and Medicaid programs; revisions to the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program. Interim final rule with comment period. Federal Register 77(236): 72985-72991, 2012