+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: an effective drainage procedure for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis



Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy: an effective drainage procedure for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis



Surgical Endoscopy 17(10): 1590-1594



This article reports the technical aspects of laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy (LCD) in patients with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) and the perioperative results are also evaluated. This is a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. Twelve patients diagnosed to have RPC with the absence of intrahepatic stricture were selected for LCD during the period from 1995 to 2002. The majority of our patients had repeated attacks of cholangitis and had already undergone multiple sessions of endoscopic and operative lithotripsy. The LCD was performed using a five-port approach with the patient lying in the supine position. The stones were first cleared through the longitudinal supraduodenal choledochotomy followed by construction of a side-to-side diamond-shaped anastomosis of at least 15 mm between the bile duct and the first part of the duodenum using 2/0 monocryl in the single-layer method. During the period from 1995 to 2002, 12 patients with RPC underwent LCD. There were 3 male and 9 female patients with a mean age of 62 (40-77). The median operation time was 137.5 min (90-270) and the median postoperative stay was 7.5 days (5-20). All cases were successful using the laparoscopic approach. Average analgesic requirement post operation was 126 mg (50-200 mg) intramuscular pethidine. There was one postoperative bile leak, and this complication was settled by conservative measures. Upon a mean follow-up of 37.6 months (6-91), there was no recurrent attack of cholangitis or any evidence of sump syndrome in this group of patients. LCD is a safe and effective drainage procedure for patients with RPC. Complications are uncommon and postoperative results are promising.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049448392

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12874693

DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8737-6


Related references

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: 'sump syndrome' following choledochoduodenostomy. Tropical Doctor 27(1): 51-52, 1997

Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 12(3): 243-248, 2005

Hand-assisted laparoscopic segmentectomy in recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Surgical Endoscopy 17(2): 324-327, 2002

Laparoscopic left hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic duct stones and recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 16(3): 105-109, 2012

Is pyogenic liver abscess associated with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis a distinct clinical entity? A retrospective analysis over a 10-year period in a regional hospital. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 23(9): 770-777, 2011

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 152: 175-192, 1984

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Anz Journal of Surgery 85(6): 491-492, 2015

Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis. Ultrasound Quarterly 14(1): 41-47, 1998

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Digestive Diseases and Sciences 55(1): 8-10, 2010

Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis. Digestive Surgery 3(4): 265-275, 1986

Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis. Current Treatment Options in Gastroenterology 7(2): 91-98, 2004

A case of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Digestive and Liver Disease 40(5): 386, 2007

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis: an update. Tropical Gastroenterology 6(3): 119-131, 1985

A study of recurrent pyogenic cholangitis. Archives of Surgery 84: 199-225, 1962

Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis in children. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery 44(1): 53-56, 1974