+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation

Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005(2): Cd003314

Providing effective positive pressure ventilation is the single most important component of successful neonatal resuscitation. Ventilation is frequently initiated with a manual resuscitation bag and face-mask (BMV) followed by endotracheal intubation (ETT) if depression continues. These techniques may be difficult to perform successfully resulting in prolonged resuscitation or severe neonatal depression. The laryngeal mask airway (LMA) may achieve initial ventilation and successful resuscitation faster than a bag-mask device or endotracheal intubation. Among newborns requiring positive pressure ventilation for resuscitation, is effective ventilation and successful resuscitation achieved faster with the LMA compared with either BMV or ETT? The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2004), MEDLINE (1966-November 2004), Pre-MEDLINE (November 15, 2004), CINAHL 1982-November 2004), reference lists of published trials, and Society for Pediatric Research abstracts were searched. Experts were contacted for additional references. Randomised and quasi-randomised trials Two reviewers independently evaluated studies, assessed methodologic quality, and extracted data using the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group criteria. Categorical treatment effects were described as relative risks and risk differences and continuous treatment effects were described as the mean difference. There were insufficient data to perform pooled analyses. No eligible studies compared the LMA with BMV. One small randomised controlled trial comparing the LMA with ETT when BMV had been unsuccessful was included. There was no statistically significant difference between the LMA and ETT with the exception of a clinically insignificant difference in time to complete insertion of the device favouring the ETT. The LMA can achieve effective ventilation during neonatal resuscitation in a time-frame consistent with current guidelines. There is no evidence to evaluate the relative efficacy and safety of the LMA compared with BMV as the primary airway device. A single, small randomised controlled trial found no clinically significant difference between the LMA and ETT when BMV was unsuccessful. Case series and case reports suggest that the LMA can provide an effective rescue airway during resuscitation if both BMV and ETT have been unsuccessful. A well-designed randomised controlled trial comparing the LMA with BMV during neonatal resuscitation is warranted.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049451978

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15846656

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003314.pub2

Related references

Laryngeal mask airway versus bag-mask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3: Cd003314, 2018

Towards evidence based emergency medicine: Best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. Bet 3. Laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation or bag-mask ventilation for cardiac arrest in adults. Emergency Medicine Journal 27(6): 477-479, 2010

Positive pressure ventilation during fibreoptic intubation: comparison of the laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask and endoscopy mask techniques. British Journal of Anaesthesia 88(2): 246-254, 2002

Airway equipment and its maintenance for a non difficult adult airway management (endotracheal intubation and its alternative: face mask, laryngeal mask airway, laryngeal tube). Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation 22(Suppl. 1): 28s-40s, 2003

Randomized, controlled trial comparing laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation during neonatal resuscitation---a secondary publication. Bmc Pediatrics 16: 17, 2016

Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway versus Face Mask during Neonatal Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Pediatrics 167(2): 286-91.E1, 2015

Bag-mask ventilation and direct laryngoscopy versus intubating laryngeal mask airway: a manikin study of hands-on times during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. European Journal of Emergency Medicine 21(3): 189-194, 2014

Can the laryngeal mask airway replace endotracheal intubation for airway control? The argument for the laryngeal mask airway. Israel Medical Association Journal 6(4): 240, 2004

Endotracheal intubation through laryngeal Ambu® Auragain™ mask airway mask in paediatric patients affected by congenital infiltrating lipomatosis. Revista Espanola de Anestesiologia Y Reanimacion 66(4): 222-225, 2019

The laryngeal mask airway is equivalent to endotracheal intubation for positive pressure ventilation in children. Anesthesiology 85(3A): A1075, 1996

Ease of ventilation through the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), the laryngeal mask airway and the face mask in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation training manikin. Resuscitation 50(2): 173-177, 2001

Endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway for esophagogastroduodenoscopy in children. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition 59(1): 54-56, 2014

Using the Intubating Laryngeal Mask Airway for Ventilation and Endotracheal Intubation in Anesthetized and Unparalyzed Acromegalic Patients. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology 16(1): 11-13, 2004

Using the intubating laryngeal mask airway for ventilation and endotracheal intubation in anesthetized and unparalyzed acromegalic patients. Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology 16(1): 11-13, 2004

Endotracheal intubation in patients with difficult airway: using laryngeal mask airway with bougie versus video laryngoscopy. Medical Gas Research 7(3): 150-155, 2017