+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer



Learning curves and impact of psychomotor training on performance in simulated colonoscopy: a randomized trial using a virtual reality endoscopy trainer



Surgical Endoscopy 18(10): 1514-1518



The aim of this study was to analyze the learning curve for the GI Mentor II endoscope trainer and to determine whether psychomotor training can contribute to an improvement in the performance of virtual colonoscopy. To analyze the learning curve, 28 subjects were divided into three groups on the basis of their experience with gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy: experienced surgeons (group 1, performed > 200 endoscopic procedures, (n = 8)) residents (group 2, performed < 50 endoscopic procedures, (n = 10)); and medical students (group 3, never performed GI endoscopy, (n = 10)). The participants were tested on the GI Mentor II virtual reality simulator 10 consecutive times. Assessment of the learning curve was based on the following three parameters: time used, number of punctured balloons, and number of wall collisions. In the second part of the study, 20 subjects who had never performed GI endoscopy were included. After performing a virtual colonoscopy, they were randomized to a group that received psychomotor training and a control group. Finally, all subjects performed a virtual colonoscopy. Assessment of endoscopic skills during the colonoscopy was based on nine parameters dealing with psychomotor skills. The learning curve for time expended reached a plateau after the second repetition for group 1 (Friedman's test, p < 0.05), after the fifth repetition for group 2 (p < 0.05), and after the seventh repetition for group 3 (p < 0.05). Experienced surgeons did not improve their scores for regarding number of balloons punctured or number of wall collisions (p > 0.05), indicating the absence of a learning curve for these parameters. Group 2 improved their scores up to the fourth and fifth repetitions, respectively (p < 0.05), and group 3 up to the fifth and seventh repetitions, respectively (p < 0.05). Experienced surgeons achieved the best performance, followed by group 2 and then group 3. The surgeons who had received psychomotor training performed the second virtual colonoscopy significantly faster than the control group (Mann-Whitney test, p < 0.001) and made significantly greater improvement in all other parameters as well. There were different learning curves for surgeons depending on their endoscopic background. The familiarization rate on the simulator was proportional to the endoscopic experience of the surgeons. Psychomotor training had a significant effect on the performance of a simulated colonoscopy.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049459166

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15791380

DOI: 10.1007/s00464-003-9264-9


Related references

Learning basic laparoscopic skills: a randomized controlled study comparing box trainer, virtual reality simulator, and mental training. Journal of Surgical Education 69(2): 190-195, 2012

Effectiveness of endoscopic surgery training for medical students using a virtual reality simulator versus a box trainer: a randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy 22(4): 985-990, 2007

Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Digestive Disease Week Abstracts & Itinerary Planner : Abstract No S1492, 2003

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Trainee-Directed Virtual Reality Simulation Training and Box Trainer on the Acquisition of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 40(3): 310-316, 2017

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 64(3): 361-368, 2006

Effect of virtual endoscopy simulator training on performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 42(12): 1049-1056, 2011

Impact of endoscopy system, high definition, and virtual chromoendoscopy in daily routine colonoscopy: a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2019, 2019

Development of simulated arthroscopic skills: A randomized trial of virtual-reality training of 21 orthopedic surgeons. Yearbook of Orthopedics 2011: 37-38, 2011

Impact of virtual reality-simulated training on urology residents' performance of transurethral resection of the prostate. Journal of Endourology 24(9): 1521-1528, 2011

Can a virtual reality surgical simulation training provide a self-driven and mentor-free skills learning? Investigation of the practical influence of the performance metrics from the virtual reality robotic surgery simulator on the skill learning and associated cognitive workloads. Surgical Endoscopy 32(1): 62-72, 2017

A prospective randomized study to test the transfer of basic psychomotor skills from virtual reality to physical reality in a comparable training setting. Annals of Surgery 241(3): 442-449, 2005

Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Learning curves and reliability measures. Surgical Endoscopy 16(12): 1746-1752, 2002

The impact of constructive feedback on training in gastrointestinal endoscopy using high-fidelity Virtual-Reality simulation: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 59(2): 181-185, 2010

Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial. Trials 20(1): 89-89, 2019

Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. American Journal of Surgery 185(2): 146-149, 2003