+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn

+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Left colonic antegrade continence enema: experience gained from 19 cases

Left colonic antegrade continence enema: experience gained from 19 cases

Journal of Pediatric Surgery 41(10): 1750-1754

As problems have developed with the right colonic antegrade continence enema procedure (Malone's procedure/Monti's retubularized ileocolostomy), left colonic antegrade continence enema (LACE) procedure, in which retubularized ileum or sigmoid colon is anastomosed into the sigmoid colon, has gained popularity. The aim of the study was to describe our experience with the LACE procedure. We retrospectively reviewed 19 LACE procedures that were performed at the Yonsei University College of Medicine Hospital (Seoul, Korea) from March 2001 to March 2005. Male-to-female ratio was 11:8, with median age of 10 years (range, 3-34 years). Most common diagnosis was meningomyelocele (78.9%, 15/19). The median total follow-up period was 23 months (range, 3-37 months); median antegrade continence enema volume used was 600 mL (range, 250-1500 mL); and median transit time was 30 minutes (range, 15-60 minutes). Patients performed antegrade continence enema with an average of once every 2 days (range, 0.3-3 days). Social continence was achieved in 14 patients (73.7%). Regurgitation of fecal material through stoma was not reported at all in 17 patients (89.5%). We recommend LACE as the procedure of choice for children with congenital malformations or any other condition predisposing to fecal incontinence or constipation intractable to conventional treatment.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049460455

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17011282

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.048

Related references

Appendicostomy stomas and antegrade colonic irrigation after laparoscopic antegrade continence enema. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A 16(4): 400-403, 2006

The role of the retrograde colonic enema in children with spina bifida: is it inferior to the antegrade continence enema?. Pediatric Surgery International 26(5): 529-533, 2010

The role of retrograde colonic enema in children with spina bifida: Is it inferior to the antegrade continence enema?. The Journal of Urology 179(4): 296, 2008

Is the outcome of the left colon antegrade continence enema better than that of the right colon antegrade continence enema?. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 44(4): 783-787, 2009

The colon flap/extension Malone antegrade continence enema: an alternative to the Monti-Malone antegrade continence enema. Journal of Urology 174(1): 299-302, 2005

Colonic tubes for the antegrade continence enema: comparison of surgical technique. Journal of Urology 172(2): 700-702, 2004

The distal left Malone antegrade continence enema--is it better?. Journal of Urology 190(4 Suppl): 1529-1533, 2013

Long-term outcome of left- vs right-sided antegrade continence enema. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 47(10): 1880-1885, 2013

Clinical experience of antegrade continence enema procedure in a boy with myelodysplasia. Rinsho Hinyokika 51(2): 149-151, 1997

The Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: the Amsterdam experience. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 46(8): 1603-1608, 2012

Left-colon antegrade continence enema (LACE) procedure for fecal incontinence. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 38(12): 1778-1780, 2003

The Macedo-Malone antegrade continence enema procedure: early experience. Journal of Urology 173(4): 1340-1344, 2005

In situ Malone antegrade continence enema in 127 patients: a 6-year experience. Journal of Urology 172(4 Pt 2): 1689-1691, 2004

Experience with glycerin for antegrade continence enema in patients with neurogenic bowel. Journal of Urology 189(2): 690-693, 2013

The Malone Antegrade Continence Enema (MACE) principle in children: is it important if the conduit is implanted in the left or the right colon?. International Braz J Urol 34(2): 206-12; Discussion 213, 2008