+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Limited cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the middle ear: a comparison with multislice helical computed tomography



Limited cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the middle ear: a comparison with multislice helical computed tomography



Acta Radiologica 48(2): 207-212



To determine the applicability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in otological imaging, and to compare its accuracy with the routinely used multislice helical CT (MSCT) for imaging of the middle- and inner-ear areas. Thirteen unoperated human cadaver temporal bones were imaged with CBCT and MSCT. Sixteen landmarks of the middle and adjacent inner ear were evaluated and compared for their conspicuity according to a modified Likert scale. Total scores and scores for subgroups including landmarks of specific clinical interest were also compared. No significant differences were found between the imaging techniques or subgroups when scores of individual structures were compared. While the middle ear itself was visible in all cases with CBCT, parts of the inner ear were "cut off" in four cases due to the limited field of view. For the same reason, the evaluation of the whole mastoid was not possible with CBCT. The cochlear and vestibular aqueducts were not visualized in either CT techniques. The contrast-to-noise ratio was more than 50% lower in CBCT than in MSCT, but still adequate for diagnostic task. CBCT proved to be at least as accurate as routinely used MSCT in revealing the clinically and surgically important middle-ear structures. The results show that high-quality imaging of the middle ear is possible with the current CBCT device.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049474783

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17354143

DOI: 10.1080/02841850601080465


Related references

Morphologic examination of the temporal bone by cone beam computed tomography: comparison with multislice helical computed tomography. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases 128(5): 230-235, 2011

Evaluation of voxel values in mandibular cancellous bone: relationship between cone-beam computed tomography and multislice helical computed tomography. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20(5): 503-506, 2009

Comparison of simulated cone beam computed tomography to conventional helical computed tomography for imaging of rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 124(9): 2002-2006, 2014

Dose and image quality of cone-beam computed tomography as compared with conventional multislice computed tomography in abdominal imaging. Investigative Radiology 49(10): 675-684, 2014

Finger fractures imaging: accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography. Skeletal Radiology 39(11): 1087-1095, 2010

Cone beam computed tomography for imaging orbital trauma--image quality and radiation dose compared with conventional multislice computed tomography. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 52(1): 76-80, 2014

Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with multislice computed tomography in detection of small osseous condylar defects. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 150(1): 130-139, 2016

Comparison of gray values of cone-beam computed tomography with hounsfield units of multislice computed tomography: An in vitro study. Indian Journal of Dental Research 28(1): 66-70, 2018

Superiority of synchrony of 256-slice cone beam computed tomography for acquiring pulsating objects. Comparison with conventional multislice computed tomography. International Journal of Cardiology 118(3): 400-405, 2007

Comparison of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography and Multislice Computed Tomography in the Assessment of Extremity Fractures. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 43(3): 372-378, 2019

Comparison between cone beam computed tomography and multislice computed tomography in diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial fractures in dried human skull: an in vitro study. Dental Traumatology 30(2): 162-168, 2014

Comparison of image validity between cone beam computed tomography for dental use and multidetector row helical computed tomography. Dento Maxillo Facial Radiology 36(8): 465-471, 2007

Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontics 107(4): 559-565, 2009

A comparative study for image quality and radiation dose of a cone beam computed tomography scanner and a multislice computed tomography scanner for paranasal sinus imaging. European Radiology 25(7): 1891-1900, 2015

Limited cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the middle ear. Acta Radiologica 48(2): 124, 2007