+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances



Long-term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances



American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123(3): 306-320



In this cephalometric investigation, we compared the long-term effects of an initial phase of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask (RME/FM) therapy followed by comprehensive edgewise therapy with the effects of growth in untreated, matched controls. The treated sample consisted of 34 patients who underwent RME/FM treatment before the pubertal growth spurt (average age, 8 years 3 months at the beginning of treatment). At the final observation period (average age, 14 years 10 months), all patients were in decelerative growth phases as determined by the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method. After the first 10 months of active treatment, significant favorable changes in both the maxillary and the mandibular skeletal components were noted. The forward movement of the maxilla was 1.8 mm greater than in the controls, mandibular projection was reduced by almost 3 mm, and the relative sagittal intermaxillary discrepancy improved by 4.3 mm, as measured by the Wits appraisal. During the posttreatment period, the treated and untreated Class III subjects generally grew similarly, although the skeletal relationship of the maxilla to the mandible remained unchanged in the RME/FM group, whereas the controls had an increased skeletal discrepancy of 3.0 mm. Over the long term, there was a slightly greater increase in midfacial length (1.6 mm) in the treatment group than in the controls. Similarly, the distance from Point A to nasion perpendicular decreased by 1.2 mm in the treated group. The overall increase in mandibular length was 2.4 mm less in the RME/FM group than in the controls, and mandibular projection relative to nasion perpendicular was 3.0 mm less in the treated group. The change in the Wits appraisal was substantial between groups (6.1 mm), with an improvement in the intermaxillary relationship in the treated group (3.4 mm); the Wits appraisal worsened (-2.7 mm) in the untreated controls. No clinically significant differences were observed between the groups in the vertical dimension. Overjet increased significantly in the treated group relative to the controls (4.4 mm), whereas the molar relationship decreased significantly (-3.9 mm). It appears that the favorable skeletal change observed over the long term is due almost entirely to the orthopedic correction achieved during the RME/FM protocol. During the posttreatment period that includes the pubertal growth spurt, craniofacial growth in RME/FM patients is similar to that of untreated Class III controls. Aggressive over-correction of the Class III skeletal malocclusion, even toward a Class II occlusal relationship, appears to be advisable, with the establishment of positive overbite and overjet relationships essential to the long-term stability of the treatment outcome.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049490399

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 12637903

DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.44


Related references

Long-term effects of rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances. Angle Orthodontist 80(1): 5-9, 2010

Long-term stability of Class III treatment: rapid palatal expansion and protraction facemask vs LeFort I maxillary advancement osteotomy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 131(1): 7.E9-7.19, 2007

Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long-term study. Seminars in Orthodontics 3(4): 265-274, 1998

Short-term effects produced by rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy in Class III patients with different vertical skeletal relationships. Angle Orthodontist 85(6): 927-933, 2015

Rapid maxillary expansion followed by fixed appliances: a long-term evaluation of changes in arch dimensions. Angle Orthodontist 73(4): 344-353, 2003

Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: a long-term controlled study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 140(4): 493-500, 2011

Long-term stability of rapid maxillary expansion combined with chincup protraction followed by fixed appliances. Angle Orthodontist 85(2): 270-277, 2016

Comparison of the effects of rapid maxillary expansion and alternate rapid maxillary expansion and constriction protocols followed by facemask therapy. Korean Journal of Orthodontics 49(1): 49-58, 2019

Long-term stability of combined rapid palatal expansion-lip bumper therapy followed by full fixed appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128(3): 310-325, 2005

Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 118(4): 404-413, 2000

3D soft tissue changes in facial morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate and class III mal occlusion under therapy with rapid maxillary expansion and delaire facemask. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 71(2): 136-151, 2010

The short-term treatment effects of face mask therapy in Class III patients based on the anchorage device: miniplates vs rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthodontist 82(5): 846-852, 2013

Early Class III treatment with a facemask anchored by fixed appliances. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics 47(7): 419-425, 2013

Long-term clinical outcome of rapid maxillary expansion as the only treatment performed in Class I malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 75(3): 416-420, 2005

Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126(5): 555-568, 2004