+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment

Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment

Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 6: 56

Musculoskeletal physiotherapists routinely assess lumbar segmental motion during the clinical examination of a patient with low back pain. The validity of manual assessment of segmental motion has not, however, been adequately investigated. In this prospective, multi-centre, pragmatic, diagnostic validity study, 138 consecutive patients with recurrent or chronic low back pain (R/CLBP) were recruited. Physiotherapists with post-graduate training in manual therapy performed passive accessory intervertebral motion tests (PAIVMs) and passive physiological intervertebral motion tests (PPIVMs). Consenting patients were referred for flexion-extension radiographs. Sagittal angular rotation and sagittal translation of each lumbar spinal motion segment was measured from these radiographs, and compared to a reference range derived from a study of 30 asymptomatic volunteers. Motion beyond two standard deviations from the reference mean was considered diagnostic of rotational lumbar segmental instability (LSI) and translational LSI. Accuracy and validity of the clinical assessments were expressed using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio statistics with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Only translation LSI was found to be significantly associated with R/CLBP (p < 0.05). PAIVMs were specific for the diagnosis of translation LSI (specificity 89%, CI 83-93%), but showed poor sensitivity (29%, CI 14-50%). A positive test results in a likelihood ratio (LR+) of 2.52 (95% CI 1.15-5.53). Flexion PPIVMs were highly specific for the diagnosis of translation LSI (specificity 99.5%; CI 97-100%), but showed very poor sensitivity (5%; CI 1-22%). Likelihood ratio statistics for flexion PPIVMs were not statistically significant. Extension PPIVMs performed better than flexion PPIVMs, with slightly higher sensitivity (16%; CI 6-38%) resulting in a likelihood ratio for a positive test of 7.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 29.2) for translation LSI. This study provides the first evidence reporting the concurrent validity of manual tests for the detection of abnormal sagittal planar motion. PAIVMs and PPIVMs are highly specific, but not sensitive, for the detection of translation LSI. Likelihood ratios resulting from positive test results were only moderate. This research indicates that manual clinical examination procedures have moderate validity for detecting segmental motion abnormality.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049499879

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16274487

DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-56

Related references

Lumbar segmental instability: Manual assessment findings supported by radiological measurement (A case study). Australian Journal of PhysioTherapy 37(3): 171-173, 1991

Manual unloading of the lumbar spine: can it identify immediate responders to mechanical traction in a low back pain population? A study of reliability and criterion referenced predictive validity. Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy 24(2): 53-61, 2016

Utility of Supine Lateral Radiographs for Assessment of Lumbar Segmental Instability in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Spine 43(18): 1275-1280, 2018

Construct validity of center of rotation in differentiating of lumbar segmental instability patients. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 28(4): 675-680, 2015

The validity of vertebral translation and rotation in differentiating patients with lumbar segmental instability. PhysioTherapy Research International 17(4): 227-234, 2012

Criterion validity of manual assessment of spinal stiffness. Manual Therapy 19(6): 589-594, 2014

Risk assessment of manual handling operations at work with the key indicator method (KIM-MHO) - determination of criterion validity regarding the prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms and clinical conditions within a cross-sectional study. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 18(1): 184, 2017

Criterion validity study of lumbar goniometers BROM II and EDI-320 for range of motion of lumbar flexion of low back pain patients. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 16(4): 159-167, 2002

Efficacy of segmental stabilization exercise for lumbar segmental instability in patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized placebo controlled crossover study. North American Journal of Medical Sciences 3(10): 456-461, 2011

Manual physical assessment of spinal segmental motion: intent and validity. Manual Therapy 14(1): 36-44, 2009

Further evidence for the validity of assessment center dimensions: a meta-analysis of the incremental criterion-related validity of dimension ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 93(5): 1042-1052, 2008

Utility of Supine Lateral Radiographs in the Assessment of Segmental Instability in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis. Spine Journal 16(10): S275-S276, 2016

Criterion-Related Validity of Sit-and-Reach Tests for Estimating Hamstring and Lumbar Extensibility: a Meta-Analysis. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine 13(1): 1-14, 2014

Lumbar Isthmic Spondylolisthesis Detection with Palpation: Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Criterion-Related Validity. Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy 14(1): 22-29, 2006

Segmental lumbar mobility in individuals with low back pain: in vivo assessment during manual and self-imposed motion using dynamic MRI. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 8: 8, 2007