+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Managerial attitude to the implementation of quality management systems in Lithuanian support treatment and nursing hospitals

Managerial attitude to the implementation of quality management systems in Lithuanian support treatment and nursing hospitals

Bmc Health Services Research 6: 120

The regulations of the Quality Management System (QMS) implementation in health care organizations were approved by the Lithuanian Ministry of Health in 1998. Following the above regulations, general managers of health care organizations had to initiate the QMS implementation in hospitals. As no research on the QMS implementation has been carried out in Lithuanian support treatment and nursing hospitals since, the objective of this study is to assess its current stage from a managerial perspective. A questionnaire survey of general managers of Lithuanian support treatment and nursing hospitals was carried out in the period of January through March 2005. Majority of the items included in the questionnaire were measured on a seven-point Likert scale. During the survey, a total of 72 questionnaires was distributed, out of which 58 filled-in ones were returned (response rate 80.6 per cent; standard sampling error 0.029 at 95 per cent level of confidence). Quality Management Systems were found operating in 39.7 per cent of support treatment and nursing hospitals and currently under implementation in 46.6 per cent of hospitals (13.7% still do not have it). The mean of the respondents' perceived QMS significance is 5.8 (on a seven-point scale). The most critical issues related to the QMS implementation include procedure development (5.5), lack of financial resources (5.4) and information (5.1), and development of work guidelines (4.6), while improved responsibility and power sharing (5.2), better service quality (5.1) and higher patient satisfaction (5.1) were perceived by the respondents as the key QMS benefits. The level of satisfaction with the QMS among the management of the surveyed hospitals is mediocre (3.6). However it was found to be higher among respondents who were more competent in quality management, were familiar with ISO 9000 standards, and had higher numbers of employees trained in quality management. QMSs are perceived to be successfully running in one third of the Lithuanian support treatment and nursing hospitals. Its current implementation stage is dependent on the hospital size - the bigger the hospital the more success it meets in the QMS implementation. As to critical Quality Management (QM) issues, hospitals tend to encounter such major problems as lack of financial resources, information and training, as well as difficulties in procedure development. On the other hand, the key factors that assist to the success of the QMS implementation comprise managerial awareness of the QMS significance and the existence of employee training systems and audit groups in hospitals.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049527424

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16987416

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-120

Related references

Document management systems to support quality management systems at university hospitals - an interview-based study. Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen 133: 40-45, 2018

Determinants of quality management systems implementation in hospitals. Health Policy 89(3): 239-251, 2009

Is having quality as an item on the executive board agenda associated with the implementation of quality management systems in European hospitals: a quantitative analysis. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 26(Suppl. 1): 92-99, 2014

The implementation of quality management systems in hospitals: a comparison between three countries. Bmc Health Services Research 6: 50, 2006

The use of managerial tools in evaluating and improving the quality of nursing care. A survey of selected hospitals in New Jersey. League Exchange 92: 1-50, 1970

Implementation of technical and managerial systems for quality control in Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) sterile release programs. Fruit fly pests: a world assessment of their biology and management 404, 1996

A check point in nursing management. Decision on the attitude towards new nurses and the implementation of the plan. Kango Tenbo. Japanese Journal of Nursing Science 14(5): 520, 1989

Influence and correlation of attitude, availability and institutional support to research implementation in nursing practice – results from an exploratory, cross-sectional quantitative study. Pflege 28(3): 145-155, 2015

A toolkit to support the implementation of electronic prescribing systems into UK hospitals: preliminary recommendations. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 107(1): 8, 2014

Implementation of a variety of computerized bedside nursing information systems in 17 New Jersey hospitals. Computers in Nursing 13(3): 96, 1995

What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation. Implementation Science 12(1): 113, 2017

Validity and reliability of the "German Utilization Questionnaire-Dissemination and Use of Research" to measure attitude, availability, and support toward implementation of research in nursing practice. Journal of Nursing Measurement 22(2): 255-267, 2014

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of computerized decision support systems in Italian hospitals: a grounded theory study. Recenti Progressi in Medicina 106(4): 180-191, 2015

Implementation of a quality improvement programme to support advance care planning in five hospitals across a health region. Bmj Supportive and Palliative Care 5(1): 91-94, 2015

The state of quality management implementation in ambulatory care nursing and inpatient nursing. Gesundheitswesen ) 75(2): 102-110, 2013