+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study



Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study



Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 59(3): 155-161



To compare the efficacy of misoprostol 50 mug vaginally and 50 mug sublingually for labor induction at term. One hundred and sixty women were randomized to receive misoprostol 50 microg vaginally (n = 80) or 50 microg sublingually misoprostol (n = 80). The doses were given every 4 h (maximum 6 doses). Primary outcome measure was number of cesarean deliveries. Induction to delivery time, delivery within 24 h, the number of misoprostol doses given; the need for oxytocin augmentation, tachysystole and uterine hyperstimulation rates and neonatal outcomes were secondary outcome measures. The mean induction to delivery time was 748 +/- 379 min in the vaginal group and 711 +/- 425 in the sublingual group (p = 0.56). The number of women delivering within 24 h was 73 (91.3%) in the vaginal group and 74 (92.5%) in the sublingual group (p = 0.78). The mean number of misoprostol doses required was significantly higher in the sublingual group (1.9 +/- 1.2) compared with the vaginal group (1.1 +/- 0.4; p < 0.001). More women in the sublingual group experienced tachysystole (n = 14, 17.5%) compared with the vaginal group (n = 3, 3.8%; p = 0.005). Seven cases (8.8%) in the vaginal group and 12 cases in the sublingual group (15%) required emergent cesarean delivery for fetal heart rate abnormalities (p = 0.22). Other neonatal outcomes including umbilical artery pH, Apgar scores and intensive care unit admission were similar in the two groups. Sublingual misoprostol is as efficacious as vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor. More frequent tachysystole is observed with misoprostol 50 microg sublingually, but neonatal outcomes are similar.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049598865

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15640607

DOI: 10.1159/000083255


Related references

Misoprostol administered sublingually at a dose of 12.5 μg versus vaginally at a dose of 25 μg for the induction of full-term labor: a randomized controlled trial protocol. Reproductive Health 15(1): 65, 2018

Oral misoprostol (100 microg) versus vaginal misoprostol (25 microg) in term labor induction: a randomized comparison. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 82(12): 1103-1106, 2003

Comparison of 25 and 50 microg vaginally administered misoprostol for preinduction of cervical ripening and labor induction. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 53(1): 16-21, 2002

Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 99(1): 145-151, 2002

Labor induction at term: a comparison of the effects of 50 microg and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 34(2): 102-105, 2007

A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 88 Suppl 2: S56-S62, 2007

Vaginal versus sublingual misoprostol for labor induction at term and post term: a randomized prospective study. Iranian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research 13(1): 299-304, 2014

Sublingual versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term: a randomized prospective placebo-controlled study. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 35(6): 1054-1060, 2010

Slow release vaginal insert of misoprostol versus orally administrated solution of misoprostol for induction of labor in primiparous term pregnant women: a randomized clinical trial. Bjog 2019, 2019

A randomized trial of mifepristone in combination with misoprostol administered sublingually or vaginally for medical abortion at 13-20 weeks gestation. Human Reproduction 20(8): 2348-2354, 2005

Cervical ripening and labor induction with 25 microg vs. 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 90(3): 234-235, 2005

Misoprostol versus oxytocin for labor induction in term and post-term pregnancy: randomized controlled trial. Sao Paulo Medical Journal 121(3): 102-106, 2003

Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for labor induction at term A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 189(6 Supplement): S211, 2003

Vaginally administered misoprostol versus the dinoprostone vaginal insert for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 176(1 PART 2): S113, 1997

A randomized comparison of oral misoprostol versus Foley catheter and oxytocin for induction of labor at term. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 181(5 PART 1): 1108-1112, 1999