+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Mixed- versus strong right-handedness is associated with biases towards "remember" versus "know" judgements in recognition memory: role of interhemispheric interaction

Mixed- versus strong right-handedness is associated with biases towards "remember" versus "know" judgements in recognition memory: role of interhemispheric interaction

Memory 12(6): 707-714

Growing evidence supports the hypothesis that episodic versus semantic memories rely primarily on interhemispheric versus intrahemispheric processing, respectively. For example, a recent study found that individuals with presumed greater interhemispheric interaction were superior in episodic recall but inferior at semantic word fragment completion; however, tests of recognition memory yielded no group differences. Interestingly, recognition memory can be based on either explicitly remembering a stimulus or implicitly knowing that a stimulus had been presented. The current experiments administered recognition memory tests to strongly versus mixed handed participants who judged for each recognised item whether their response was based on remembering (episodic memory) or knowing (semantic memory) (Tulving, 1983). Results indicate that strong versus mixed handers are biased towards basing recognition responses on judgements of knowing versus remembering, respectively. As strong versus mixed handedness is associated with greater versus lesser interhemispheric processing, the results support the original hypothesis.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049601695

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15724359

DOI: 10.1080/09658210344000503

Related references

Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: handedness and interhemispheric interaction. Brain and Cognition 63(1): 51-58, 2006

Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution. Laterality 9(4): 433-447, 2004

A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: a possible role of interhemispheric interaction. Memory & Cognition 33(4): 751-757, 2005

Inconsistent handedness and saccade execution benefit face memory without affecting interhemispheric interaction. Memory 19(6): 613-624, 2012

Interhemispheric interaction and egocentrism: the role of handedness in social comparative judgement. British Journal of Social Psychology 51(1): 111-129, 2012

Context, remember-know recognition judgements, and ROC parameters. Memory 15(5): 477-494, 2007

Revisiting the role of recollection in item versus forced-choice recognition memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12(4): 720-725, 2006

Remember to do: insomnia versus control groups in a prospective memory task. Behavioral Sleep Medicine 13(3): 231-240, 2015

Memory biases in left versus right implied motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19(2): 471-484, 1993

The role of “iwakan in the asymmetric effect of additions versus deletions on recognition memory for pictures. Japanese Psychological Research 53(4): 426-439, 2011

Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36(2): 558-566, 2010

Metacognitive inferences in source memory judgements: the role of perceived differences in item recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60(7): 1015-1040, 2007

I remember you: a role for memory in social cognition and the functional neuroanatomy of their interaction. Brain Research 1428: 43-50, 2012

Nicotine effects interhemispheric processing in simple recognition versus arithmetic related tasks in a sexually dimorphic pattern. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 18(1-2): 1210, 1992

Different importance of the volatile and non-volatile fractions of an olfactory signature for individual social recognition in rats versus mice and short-term versus long-term memory. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 94(4): 568-575, 2011