EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Optimization of collimator parameters to reduce rectal dose in intensity-modulated prostate treatment planning



Optimization of collimator parameters to reduce rectal dose in intensity-modulated prostate treatment planning



Medical Dosimetry 30(4): 205-212



The inability to avoid rectal wall irradiation has been a limiting factor in prostate cancer treatment planning. Treatment planners must not only consider the maximum dose that the rectum receives throughout a course of treatment, but also the dose that any volume of the rectum receives. As treatment planning techniques have evolved and prescription doses have escalated, limitations of rectal dose have remained an area of focus. External pelvic immobilization devices have been incorporated to aid in daily reproducibility and lessen concern for daily patient motion. Internal immobilization devices (such as the intrarectal balloon) and visualization techniques (including daily ultrasound or placement of fiducial markers) have been utilized to reduce the uncertainty of intrafractional prostate positional variation, thus allowing for minimization of treatment volumes. Despite these efforts, prostate volumes continue to abut portions of the rectum, and the necessary volume expansions continue to include portions of the anterior rectal wall within high-dose regions. The addition of collimator parameter optimization (both collimator angle and primary jaw settings) to intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allows greater rectal sparing compared to the use of IMRT alone. We use multiple patient examples to illustrate the positive effects seen when utilizing collimator parameter optimization in conjunction with IMRT to further reduce rectal doses.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049811432

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16275562

DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2005.06.002



Related references

Intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning for dynamic multileaf collimator delivery: Influence of different parameters on dose distributions. Radiotherapy & Oncology 66(1): 19-28, January, 2003

Effects of multileaf collimator parameters on treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Medical Dosimetry 32(1): 38-43, 2007

Clinical effect of multileaf collimator width on the incidence of late rectal bleeding after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 21(1): 156-161, 2016

Impact of changing rectal dose volume parameters over time on late rectal and urinary toxicity after high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A 10-years single centre experience. Acta Oncologica 54(6): 854-861, 2016

Dose escalation to the prostate while keeping the maximal rectal dose unchanged is possible with intensity modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 45(3 SUPPL ): 260, 1999

Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: A strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 39(4): 863-873, 1997

A parameter optimization algorithm for intensity-modulated radiotherapy prostate treatment planning. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 3(3): 227-234, 2002

Optimization of beam parameters and treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 2(5): 437-444, 2003

A retrospective planning analysis comparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using two optimization algorithms for the treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 60(3): 84-92, 2013

Rectal toxicity after intensity modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: which rectal dose volume constraints should we use?. RadioTherapy and Oncology 113(3): 398-403, 2015

Pelvic Lymph Node Irradiation Including Pararectal Sentinel Nodes for Prostate Cancer Patients: Treatment Optimization Comparing Intensity Modulated X-rays, Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, and Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy. Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment 14(2): 181-189, 2016

Comparison of 2D conventional, 3D conformal, and intensity-modulated treatment planning techniques for patients with prostate cancer with regard to target-dose homogeneity and dose to critical, uninvolved structures. Medical Dosimetry 24(4): 255-263, 2000

Dose verification of intensity-modulated arc therapy using an ERGO++ treatment planning system and Elekta internal multileaf collimators for prostate cancer treatment. British Journal of Radiology 82(976): 328-331, 2008