+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection

POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM: implementation issues in a United States health care system for prediction of outcome for colon cancer resection

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 47(9): 1435-1441

The Physiologic and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth revision (p)-POSSUM, and colorectal (Cr)-POSSUM scoring systems were developed as audit tools for comparing outcomes in surgical and colorectal patients on the basis of operative risk assessment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of these systems to a cohort of colon cancer patients undergoing surgery in the United States. POSSUM factors from 890 consecutive patients undergoing major surgical procedures for colon cancer in nine United States hospitals over a two-year period from January 2000 through December 2001 were prospectively collected. The observed over the expected hospital mortality was compared by means of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems. The effect of missing data on the utility of this process for outcome assessment was assessed with three methods for data imputation. The number of resections per institution ranged from 13 to 437. The observed mortality rate ranged from 0.8 percent to 15.4 percent among the institutions, with an overall operative mortality of 2.3 percent. The POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and Cr-POSSUM predicted mortality was 10.7 percent, 11.2 percent, and 4.9 percent, respectively. The POSSUM and p-POSSUM models overpredicted mortality in all institutions ( P < 0.01), whereas the Cr-POSSUM demonstrated an observed over expected hospital mortality ratio of >1 in three institutions. The calculations were unaffected by the various methods of inserting missing data. An apparent overprediction of mortality for colon cancer resection was evident with all three POSSUM variants. This implies that a calibration process is required for use of these variants in the United States health care system. Missing data may be treated as normal values without influencing outcome. The Cr-POSSUM appeared to be the most promising audit tool for colorectal cancer surgery; however, it will require further refinement to provide process control graphs for identification of potential outliers and improvement in the quality of care in the United States.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049842753

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15486738

DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0604-1

Related references

Comparison of outcome of POSSUM, p-POSSUM, and cr-POSSUM scoring after elective resection of the sigmoid colon for carcinoma or complicated diverticular disease. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology 42(7): 841-847, 2007

Predictive value of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, cr-POSSUM, APACHE II and ACPGBI scoring systems in colorectal cancer resection. Journal of International Medical Research 39(4): 1464-1473, 2011

A comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM for the prediction of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing colorectal resection. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 49(3): 330-335, 2006

Evaluation of outcome of laparoscopic colorectal resection with POSSUM, Portsmouth POSSUM and colorectal POSSUM. British Journal of Surgery 93(1): 94-99, 2006

Predicting Post-Operative Mortality in Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Accuracy of Possum, P-Possum and Cr-Possum. Gastroenterology 138(5): S-853, 2010

Evaluation of the POSSUM, p-POSSUM, o-POSSUM, and APACHE II scoring systems in predicting postoperative mortality and morbidity in gastric cancer patients. Asian Journal of Surgery 40(2): 89-94, 2017

Mortality rate prediction by Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM), Portsmouth POSSUM and Colorectal POSSUM and the development of new scoring systems in Chinese colorectal cancer patients. American Journal of Surgery 198(1): 31-38, 2009

Evaluation of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM scores in patients with gastric cancer undergoing resection. Hepato-Gastroenterology 51(60): 1864-1866, 2004

Comparison of P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scores in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection. Archives of Surgery 142(11): 1043-1048, 2007

Evaluation of P-POSSUM and CR-POSSUM scores in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing resection. World Journal of Surgery 30(12): 2266-2269, 2006

Colorectal surgical mortality and morbidity in elderly patients: comparison of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, CR-POSSUM, and CR-BHOM. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 30(2): 173-179, 2015

An evaluation of morbidity and mortality in oncologic gastric surgery with the application of POSSUM, P-POSSUM, and O-POSSUM. World Journal of Surgery 33(9): 1889-1894, 2009

Comparison of the possum, P-POSSUM and Cr-POSSUM scoring systems as predictors of postoperative mortality in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. Anz Journal of Surgery 76(9): 812-816, 2006

Development of a contraceptive vaccine for the marsupial brushtail possum lack of effects in mice and chickens immunised with recombinant possum ZP3 protein and a possum ZP3 antifertility epitope. Wildlife Research: 6, 563-572, 2008

Perioperative mortality and morbidity prediction using POSSUM, P-POSSUM and APACHE II in Chinese gastric cancer patients: surgical method is a key independent factor affecting prognosis. International Journal of Clinical Oncology 19(1): 74-80, 2014