+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery



Patient controlled intravenous opioid analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia for pain after intra-abdominal surgery



Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005(1): Cd004088



There are two common techniques for postoperative pain control after intra-abdominal surgery: patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous opioids and continuous epidural analgesia (CEA). It is uncertain which method has better pain control and fewer adverse effects. The objective of this review was to compare PCA opioid therapy with CEA for pain control after intra-abdominal surgery in terms of analgesic efficacy, side effects, patient satisfaction and surgical outcome by meta-analysis of the relevant trials. We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2002), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2002), EMBASE (January 1988 to October 2002), and reference lists of articles. We also contacted researchers in the field. Randomized controlled trials of adult patients after intra-abdominal surgery comparing the effect of two pain control regimens in terms of analgesic efficacy and side effects. In the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) group the patient should be able to operate the device himself. In the continuous epidural analgesia group there was no PCA device. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. Nine studies involving 711 participants were included. The PCA group had a higher pain visual analogue scale than the CEA group during 6, 24 and 72 hour periods. The weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval of resting pain was 1.74 (95% CI 1.30 to 2.19), 0.99 (95% CI 0.65 to 1.33), and 0.63 (95% CI 0.24 to 1.01), respectively. The length of hospital stay and other adverse effects were not statistically different except that the incidence of pruritus was lower in the PCA group, odds ratio of 0.27 (95% CI 0.11 to 0.64). CEA is superior to opioid PCA in relieving postoperative pain for up to 72 hours in patients undergoing intra-abdominal surgery, but it is associated with a higher incidence of pruritus. There is insufficient evidence to draw comparisons about the other advantages and disadvantages of these two methods of pain relief.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 049871954

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15674928

DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004088.pub2


Related references

Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 8: Cd010434, 2018

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia, versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after major lower abdominal surgery. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine 29: 84-84, 2004

Continuous epidural analgesia with bupivacaine-fentanyl versus patient-controlled analgesia with i.v. morphine for postoperative pain relief after knee ligament surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 44(1): 37-42, 2000

Postoperative analgesia after major spine surgery: patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 103(5): 1311-1317, 2006

Efficacy of postoperative patient-controlled and continuous infusion epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with opioids: a meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 103(5): 1079-88; Quiz 1109-10, 2005

Intravenous patient controlled analgesia combined with continuous thoracic epidural analgesia for post-thoracotomy pain. Masui. Japanese Journal of Anesthesiology 49(11): 1222-1225, 2000

Efficacy of Postoperative Patient-controlled and Continuous Infusion Epidural Analgesia versus Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia with Opioids. Anesthesiology 103(5): 1079-1088, 2005

Evaluation of costs and effects of epidural analgesia and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after major abdominal surgery. British Journal of Anaesthesia 96(1): 111-117, 2006

Influence of patient-controlled epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia on postoperative pain control and recovery after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Gastric Cancer 16(2): 193-200, 2013

Continuous epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled analgesia after knee ligament surgery. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 45(1): 129, 2001

Epidural Bupivacaine-Morphine Analgesia versus Patient-controlled Analgesia following Abdominal Aortic Surgery. Anesthesiology 89(3): 585-593, 1998

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Postoperative Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Intravenous Patient-controlled Analgesia After Major Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery. Annals of Surgery 266(3): 545-554, 2017

Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine 22(16): 1892-6; Discussion 1896-7, 1997

Postoperative pain management after minimally invasive hysterectomy: thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Der Anaesthesist 62(10): 797-807, 2013

Thoracic epidural analgesia versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for the treatment of rib fracture pain after motor vehicle crash. Journal of Trauma 47(3): 564-567, 1999