EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Penetrating neck injuries in children: a retrospective review


Pediatric Emergency Care 19(5): 308-313
Penetrating neck injuries in children: a retrospective review
Penetrating Neck Injuries (PNI) are uncommon in the pediatric population, but they constitute a significant management challenge. Literature has been scant regarding the evaluation and treatment of such injuries in children. Our objective is to evaluate if physical examination alone is sufficient in the assessment and management of pediatric PNI. Retrospective chart review. Pediatric emergency center of an urban emergency department (ED) and level 1 trauma center (TC). All patients 16 years or younger that had penetrating neck injuries between January 1995 and June 2000. None. During the study period, a total of 148,000 and 9900 patients were seen in the pediatric ED and the TC, respectively. Thirty-one children (22 males, 9 females) with PNI were identified. The median age was 9.5 years (range of 10 months to 16 years). Most children (81%) with PNI were evaluated in the TC. Motor vehicle crashes accounted for 32% of PNI and gun shot wounds for 23% of cases. Most PNI (84%) occurred in zone II of the neck. Eight patients underwent surgical exploration (25.8%) for platysmal penetration, none of which revealed any vascular injuries. Only 4 patients had barium swallows performed based on physical examination findings. All barium swallows were normal. There were no angiograms performed during the study period. A total of 3 patients died (mortality rate of 9%), all of which had major physical examination findings. PNI are infrequent in the pediatric population. Most of the patients in our review presented with minor physical examination findings and did not require exploration or diagnostic studies. Observation of the stable child in our case series was found to be an acceptable choice of management of PNI. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 049881908

PMID: 14578829

DOI: 10.1097/01.pec.0000092575.40174.f3



Related references

Penetrating zone-II neck injuries in children. Journal of Trauma 31(12): 1614-1617, 1991

Penetrating injuries of the neck: review of 16 operated cases. Annali Italiani di Chirurgia 74(2): 141-148, 2003

Penetrating injuries restricted to the cauda equina: a retrospective review. Neurosurgery 31(2): 265-9; Discussion 269-70, 1992

Feasibility of endovascular repair in penetrating axillosubclavian injuries: a retrospective review. Journal of Vascular Surgery 41(2): 246-254, 2005

Re: An evidence-based review of the assessment and management of penetrating neck injuries. Clinical Otolaryngology 37(4): 331; Author Reply 331-2, 2013

A ten-year retrospective review: does pyloric exclusion improve clinical outcome after penetrating duodenal and combined pancreaticoduodenal injuries?. Journal of Trauma 62(4): 829-833, 2007

Emergency endovascular management of penetrating gunshot injuries to the arteries in the face and neck: a case series and review of the literature. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 6(1): 42-46, 2014

Conservative management of laryngeal perforation in a rural setting: case report and review of the literature on penetrating neck injuries. Cjem 13(2): 127-132, 2011

Penetrating chest injuries in children: a review of 94 cases. Journal of Pediatric Surgery 31(5): 673-676, 1996

Management of penetrating neck injuries. The controversy surrounding zone II injuries. Surgical Clinics of North America 71(2): 267-296, 1991