+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Performance of bispectral index and auditory evoked potential monitors in detecting loss of consciousness during anaesthetic induction with propofol with and without fentanyl



Performance of bispectral index and auditory evoked potential monitors in detecting loss of consciousness during anaesthetic induction with propofol with and without fentanyl



European Journal of Anaesthesiology 21(10): 807-811



To investigate and compare the performance of bispectral index (BIS) and auditory evoked response index (AAI) in detecting the transition from consciousness to unconsciousness during anaesthesia induction by propofol, alone and in combination with fentanyl. Anaesthesia was induced with either an intravenous infusion of 30 mg kg(-1)h(-1) of propofol plus 2 microg kg(-1) of fentanyl (Group PF, n = 20) or an intravenous infusion of 30 mg kg(-1) h(-1) of propofol plus normal saline (Group P, n = 20). BIS, AAI and the doses of propofol administered were recorded at the end-point of unresponsiveness to verbal commands. The propofol plasma concentration was also measured. The propofol dose and plasma propofol concentration required to achieve loss of consciousness were significantly lower in patients pretreated with fentanyl (P < 0.001). The mean BIS value at loss of consciousness was significantly different between the two groups (74.10 in Group PF vs. 60.80 in Group P) (P < 0.001). However, no difference in the AAI was seen between the two groups at loss of consciousness (32.90 in Group PF vs. 31.80 in Group P) (P > 0.05). In both groups, the regression analysis values (r-values) between BIS and plasma propofol concentrations at the onset of unconsciousness were higher than those between AAI and propofol concentrations (0.553 vs. 0.180 in Group P; 0.432 vs. 0.308 in Group PF). These results show that a fentanyl bolus is effective in augmenting the hypnotic effect of propofol during anaesthesia induction. AAI appears to be able to measure the transition from consciousness to unconsciousness at similar values, regardless of whether or not fentanyl pretreatment is used whereas the BIS values were not independent of fentanyl pretreatment. This suggests that AAI may be a better indicator of conscious status during propofol/fentanyl anaesthesia, where it appears to be independent of the anaesthesia regimen.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 049889336

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15678736


Related references

Performance of bispectral index and auditory evoked potential monitors in detecting loss of consciousness during anaesthetic induction with propofol with and without fentanyl. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 21(10): 807-811, 2004

The performance of electroencephalogram bispectral index and auditory evoked potential index to predict loss of consciousness during propofol infusion. Anesthesia and Analgesia 89(5): 1311-1315, 1999

Variability comparison of the composite auditory evoked potential index and the bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesia and Analgesia 107(1): 117-124, 2008

Effects of fentanyl, alfentanil, remifentanil and sufentanil on loss of consciousness and bispectral index during propofol induction of anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia 86(4): 523-527, 2001

Comparison of auditory evoked potentials and EEG-Bispectral Index for monitoring of midazolam-fentanyl-propofol anesthesia induction. Anesthesia & Analgesia 94(2S Suppl.): S 155, 2002

ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during the induction of anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil. Anesthesia and Analgesia 97(1): 139-44, Table of Contents, 2003

New composite index based on midlatency auditory evoked potential and electroencephalographic parameters to optimize correlation with propofol effect site concentration: comparison with bispectral index and solitary used fast extracting auditory evoked potential index. Anesthesiology 103(3): 500-507, 2005

40-Hz Auditory steady-state response and bispectral index as monitors of the level of consciousness during anesthesia with propofol. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 45(5 Part 2): A27, 1998

Auditory Evoked Potential Index and Bispectral IndexTM during Induction of Anesthesia with Propofol and Remifentanil. Anesthesiology Abstracts of Scientific Papers Annual Meeting ( ): Abstract No A-540, 2002

Performance of the ARX-derived auditory evoked potential index as an indicator of anesthetic depth: a comparison with bispectral index and hemodynamic measures during propofol administration. Anesthesiology 96(4): 803-816, 2002

Comparison of the two different auditory evoked potentials index monitors in propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 21(8): 551-554, 2009

Effects of the auditory stimuli of an auditory evoked potential system on levels of consciousness, and on the bispectral index. British Journal of Anaesthesia 87(5): 778-780, 2001

Effects of the auditory stimuli of an auditory evoked potential system on levels of consciousness, and on the bispectral index. British Journal of Anaesthesia 87(5): 778-780, 2001

Can bispectral index or auditory evoked potential index predict implicit memory during propofol-induced sedation?. Chinese Medical Journal 119(11): 894-898, 2006

Relationship between bispectral index, auditory evoked potential index and effect-site EC50 for propofol at two clinical end-points. British Journal of Anaesthesia 90(2): 127-131, 2003