EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Predicting inpatient violence using an extended version of the Brøset-Violence-Checklist: instrument development and clinical application


Bmc Psychiatry 6(): 17-17
Predicting inpatient violence using an extended version of the Brøset-Violence-Checklist: instrument development and clinical application
Patient aggression is a common problem in acute psychiatric wards and calls for preventive measures. The timely use of preventive measures presupposes a preceded risk assessment. The Norwegian Brøset-Violence-Checklist (BVC) is one of the few instruments suited for short-time prediction of violence of psychiatric inpatients in routine care. Aims of our study were to improve the accuracy of the short-term prediction of violence in acute inpatient settings by combining the Brøset-Violence-Checklist (BVC) with an overall subjective clinical risk-assessment and to test the application of the combined measure in daily practice. We conducted a prospective cohort study with two samples of newly admitted psychiatric patients for instrument development (219 patients) and clinical application (300 patients). Risk of physical attacks was assessed by combining the 6-item BVC and a 6-point score derived from a Visual Analog Scale. Incidents were registered with the Staff Observation of Aggression Scale-Revised SOAS-R. Test accuracy was described as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCROC). The AUCROC of the new VAS-complemented BVC-version (BVC-VAS) was 0.95 in and 0.89 in the derivation and validation study respectively. The BVC-VAS is an easy to use and accurate instrument for systematic short-term prediction of violent attacks in acute psychiatric wards. The inclusion of the VAS-derived data did not change the accuracy of the original BVC.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 049974981

PMID: 16638122

DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-6-17



Related references

Predicting inpatient violence in acute psychiatric wards using the Brøset-Violence-Checklist: a multicentre prospective cohort study. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 11(4): 422-427, 2004

The diagnostic efficiency of the extended German Brøset Violence Checklist to assess the risk of violence. Journal of Nursing Measurement 22(2): 201-212, 2014

Sensitivity and specificity of the Brøset Violence Checklist as predictor of violence in forensic psychiatry. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 68(8): 536-542, 2015

Assessing risk for imminent violence in the elderly: the Brøset Violence Checklist. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22(9): 862-867, 2007

Predicting inpatient violence using the Broset Violence Checklist (BVC). International Journal of Psychiatric Nursing Research 4(3): 498-505, 1999

The Brøset Violence Checklist: clinical utility in a secure psychiatric intensive care setting. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 17(7): 614-620, 2010

The Brøset violence checklist (BVC). Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. Supplementum (): 103-105, 2002

Short-term risk prediction: the Brøset Violence Checklist. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 10(2): 236-238, 2003

Acceptability and psychometric properties of Brøset Violence Checklist in psychiatric care settings in China. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 21(9): 848-855, 2015

Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67(6): 917-930, 1999