+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Resource utilization and outcome in gravely ill intensive care unit patients with predicted in-hospital mortality rates of 95% or higher by APACHE III scores: the relationship with physician and family expectations



Resource utilization and outcome in gravely ill intensive care unit patients with predicted in-hospital mortality rates of 95% or higher by APACHE III scores: the relationship with physician and family expectations



Mayo Clinic Proceedings 80(2): 166-173



To assess resource utilization and outcome in gravely ill patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and the potential association with health care workers' and family members' expectations. We retrospectively evaluated ICU patients with a predicted in-hospital mortality rate of 95% or higher (PM95) using the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III (APACHE III) on 2 consecutive days. All patients were admitted to a single institution between September 30, 1994, and August 9, 2001. The APACHE III database contained data from 38,165 ICU patients during the study interval. Of these, 248 (0.65% of ICU admissions) achieved PM95 status and were included in the study. Between PM95 and hospital discharge, resource utilization (eg, blood transfusion, hemodialysis, surgery, and computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging) was extensive. A total of 23% of patients survived to hospital discharge, yet all but 1 were moderately or severely disabled. One year after achieving PM95, 10% (95% confidence interval, 7%-15%) of patients were alive. For 229 patients, the medical records contained physician documentation that indicated a likely fatal outcome. Thirty-six of these medical records documented unrealistic family expectations of a good outcome. The latter finding correlated with increased resource utilization without significant improvement in 1-year survival. In contrast, absence of physician documentation of a likely fatal outcome In 19 patients correlated with an improved likelihood of hospital (74%) and 1-year (47%) survival. Despite better-than-predicted survival outcomes, patient functionality and 1-year survival were poor. Unrealistic family expectations were associated with increased resource utilization without significant survival benefit, whereas absence of physician documentation of likely impending death (which correlated with improved survival) may denote the prognostication skills of experienced clinicians.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 050192544

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15704770

DOI: 10.4065/80.2.166


Related references

Intensive care unit resource use and outcome in elderly patients with high apache scores. American Review of Respiratory Disease 145(4 PART 2): A85, 1992

Apache II Hospital mortality relationship Validation in Canadian intensive care unit patients. Clinical & Investigative Medicine 16(4 SUPPL ): B28, 1993

APACHE II scoring system on a general intensive care unit: audit of daily APACHE II scores and 6-month survival of 691 patients admitted to a general intensive care unit between May 1990 and December 1991. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 87(2): 73-77, 1994

Severity of illness assessment with application of the APACHE IV predicted mortality and outcome trends analysis in an academic cardiac intensive care unit. Journal of Critical Care 50: 242-246, 2019

Severity scores in respiratory intensive care: APACHE II predicted mortality better than SAPS II. Respiratory Care 40(10): 1042-1047, 1995

The impact of complications on the resource utilization hospital charges and outcome in the surgical intensive care unit sicu a study in 1438 patients. Critical Care Medicine 18(4 SUPPL): S196, 1990

Predicting outcome among intensive care unit patients using computerised trend analysis of daily Apache II scores corrected for organ system failure. Intensive Care Medicine 14(5): 558-566, 1988

An analysis of excess mortality not predicted to occur by APACHE III in an Australian level III intensive care unit. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 28(2): 171-177, 2000

Evaluation of predictive ability of APACHE II system and hospital outcome in Canadian intensive care unit patients. Critical Care Medicine 23(7): 1177-1183, 1995

The association between the APACHE-II scores and age groups for predicting mortality in an intensive care unit: a retrospective study. Romanian Journal of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 26(1): 53-58, 2019

An audit of mortality by using ECMO specific scores and APACHE II scoring system in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a tertiary intensive care unit in Hong Kong. Journal of Thoracic Disease 11(2): 445-455, 2019

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Development of APACHE. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S181-S185, 1989

APACHE III study design: analytic plan for evaluation of severity and outcome in intensive care unit patients. Development of APACHE III. Critical Care Medicine 17(12 Pt 2): S199-S203, 1989

Comparison of the acute physiology and chronic health evaluation score (APACHE) II with GCS in predicting hospital mortality of neurosurgical intensive care unit patients. Global Journal of Health Science 4(3): 179-184, 2012

Comparison of the accuracy and correctness of mortality estimates for Intensive Care Unit patients in internal clinics of the Czech Republic using APACHE II, APACHE IV, SAPS 3 and MPMoIII models. Medicinski Glasnik 13(2): 82-89, 2017