+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision



The effect of circumferential tumor location in clinical outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision



Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 48(12): 2249-2257



A positive circumferential resection margin is associated with a high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. The mesorectum is thinner anteriorly than posteriorly, and the risk of a positive resection margin may be higher for anterior than for posterior tumors. We sought to determine the effect of the tumor's position in the circumference of the rectum on the treatment and outcomes of rectal cancer patients treated by total mesorectal excision. We retrospectively analyzed 401 patients with rectal cancer staged by preoperative endorectal ultrasound and treated by sharp mesorectal excision with or without neoadjuvant therapy. Tumors were classified into four groups (anterior, posterior, lateral, and circumferential) according to the location of deepest point of penetration on endorectal ultrasound. Differences in recurrence and survival rates were analyzed with logistic regression analysis. Of the 401 tumors, 27 percent were anterior, 26 percent posterior, 32 percent lateral, and 15 percent circumferential. The groups did not differ in age, gender, tumor distance from the anal verge, or tumor grade. The ultrasound and pathology stages were more advanced in the circumferential group, and the proportion of uT4 tumors was higher in the anterior group. Circumferential and anterior tumors were more likely to receive preoperative adjuvant radiation. After an average follow-up of 44 months, 20 percent of patients had developed recurrence (13 percent distant, 6 percent local, and 1 percent distant and local). Recurrence was associated with advanced tumor stage, tumor proximity to the anal verge, and no preoperative adjuvant therapy. Early tumor stage and preoperative chemoradiation were associated with lower recurrence and improved survival. When tumor stage was controlled for, patients with poor or undifferentiated tumors and male patients with anterior tumors were shown to have a higher risk of recurrence or death. The estimated five-year disease-free survival for the entire group was 73 percent. Tumor stage is the main criterion to estimate prognosis in rectal cancer patients. The position of the tumor within the circumference of the rectum may provide valuable clinical information. Anterior tumors tend to be more advanced and, at least in male patients, has a higher risk of recurrence and death than tumors in other locations.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 050610890

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16400512

DOI: 10.1007/s10350-005-0186-6


Related references

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision in Lower Rectal Cancer: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes with Conventional Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A, 2017

Comparative Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Treatment Prior to Total Mesorectal Excision and Total Mesorectal Excision Alone in Selected Stage II/III Low and Mid Rectal Cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 23(1): 106-113, 2016

Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision. Bmc Cancer 16(): 380-380, 2016

Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscope-assisted transanal total mesorectal excision and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 21(8): 924-935, 2018

Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 14(2): 462-469, 2006

Clinical outcomes and case volume effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a systematic review. Techniques in Coloproctology (): -, 2016

Circumferential margin plays an independent impact on the outcome of rectal cancer patients receiving curative total mesorectal excision. American Journal of Surgery 206(5): 771-777, 2014

Causes of fecal and urinary incontinence after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer based on cadaveric surgery: a study from the Cooperative Clinical Investigators of the Dutch total mesorectal excision trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 26(27): 4466-4472, 2008

Trans-anal total mesorectal excision: is it really safe and better than laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with perineal approach first in patients with low rectal cancer? A learning curve with case-matched study in 68 patients. Colorectal Disease, 2018

Risk factors for circumferential R1 resection after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a study in 233 consecutive patients with mid or low rectal cancer. International Journal of Colorectal Disease 30(2): 197-203, 2015

Impact of Lymph Node Ratio on Oncologic Outcomes in ypStage III Rectal Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy followed by Total Mesorectal Excision, and Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Plos One 10(9): E0138728-E0138728, 2016

Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Outcomes after 140 Patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221(2): 415-423, 2015

Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery 89(3): 327-334, 2002

Circumferential margin involvement after total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer: are all R1 resections equal?. Colorectal Disease 19(11): O377-O385, 2017

The circumferential margin in rectal cancer: Recommendations based on the Dutch total mesorectal excision study. European Journal of Cancer 38(7): 973-976, 2002