EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator



Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator



Resuscitation 64(1): 63-69



This is a study of the influence of transthoracic impedance (TTI) on defibrillation, resuscitation and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), treated with a non-escalating impedance-compensating 150 J biphasic waveform defibrillator. Cardiac arrest data from two EMS systems were analyzed retrospectively. All witnessed arrests from patients who presented with a shockable rhythm and were treated initially by BLS personnel were included (n = 102). For each defibrillation and resuscitation outcome variable, we tested differences in mean TTI for successful versus unsuccessful outcome. The effect of call-to-shock time on overall outcome was also examined. Initial shocks defibrillated 90% [83-95%] (95% confidence interval) of patients. Cumulative success with two shocks was 98% [93-100%] and with three shocks was 99% [95-100%]. TTI averaged 90 +/- 23 Omega. First-shock success, cumulative success through two shocks and cumulative success through the first-shock series were unrelated to TTI, as were BLS ROSC, pre-hospital ROSC, hospital admission and discharge. In contrast and consistent with previous findings, call-to-shock time was highly predictive of survival. High impedance patients were defibrillated by the biphasic waveform used in this study at high rates with a fixed energy of 150 J and without energy escalation. Rapid defibrillation rather than differences in patient impedance accounts for resuscitation success.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 050825087

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15629557

DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.06.021



Related references

Body weight does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation, or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a nonescalating biphasic waveform defibrillator. Critical Care Medicine 32(9 Suppl): S387-S392, 2004

Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation efficacy in cardiac arrest victims when shocks are delivered with an impedance-compensating biphasic waveform. Circulation 96(8 SUPPL ): I561, 10/21/97, 1997

Transthoracic incremental monophasic versus biphasic defibrillation by emergency responders (TIMBER): a randomized comparison of monophasic with biphasic waveform ascending energy defibrillation for the resuscitation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation. Circulation 114(19): 2010-2018, 2006

Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology 32(6): 631-644, 1998

Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with a low-energy impedance-compensating biphasic waveform automatic external defibrillator. The LIFE Investigators. Biomedical Instrumentation & Technology 32(6): 631-644, 1999

Fixed-energy biphasic waveform defibrillation in a pediatric model of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Critical Care Medicine 30(12): 2736-2741, 2002

Interaction of defibrillation waveform with the time to defibrillation or the number of defibrillation attempts on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation, 2017

Interaction of defibrillation waveform with the time to defibrillation or the number of defibrillation attempts on survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 122: 54-60, 2018

Rectilinear biphasic waveform defibrillation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care 8(4): 388-392, 2005

Rectilinear biphasic waveform defibrillation of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Prehospital Emergency Care 8(4): 388-392, 2004

Low energy biphasic waveform defibrillation minimizes post resuscitation myocardial dysfunction after prolonged cardiac arrest. Circulation 100(18 SUPPL ): I 867, Nov 2, 1999

Biphasic versus monophasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2(): Cd006762-Cd006762, 2016

A blinded, randomized comparison of biphasic and monophasic waveform defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. European Heart Journal 22(Abstract Supplement): 242, September, 2001

Patient outcomes following defibrillation with a low energy biphasic truncated exponential waveform in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 49(1): 9-14, 2001

A prospective, randomized and blinded comparison of monophasic and biphasic waveform defibrillation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. European Heart Journal 24(Abstract Supplement): 729, August-September, 2003