+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust



Two key factors that belong in a macroergonomic analysis of electronic monitoring: Employee perceptions of fairness and the climate of organizational trust or distrust



Applied Ergonomics 23(1): 35-42



Two microergonomic elements not usually discussed in treatments of electronic monitoring of VDT clerical work are employee perceptions of fairness (in work standards and measurement process) and the overall climate of employee trust in management. The author's field studies found these factors serving as major mitigating or intensifying elements in the stress that clerical employees can experience when they perform intensive heavy-duty VDT applications, and as central variables in distinguishing beneficial from harmful monitoring programmes. A case study involving change in supervisory monitoring policies for 200 customer service agents at one of Federal Express Corporation's telecommunication call centres in the USA in 1985-86 demonstrates how a Unit Head at a non-union company long known for its positive employee relations policies installed monitoring practices that the call agents considered unfair and a breach of the company's traditional climate of employee-employer trust. Employee protests, when communicated to top management, led to discarding the unilaterally-instituted and quantity-oriented monitoring policy and replacing it with a consensually-developed supervisory monitoring system balancing quality and quantity elements in a way that satisfied both employees and management. The present system of supervisory monitoring of customer service work at Federal Express (1991) enjoys broad employee support, suggesting that a fair system of monitoring, applied in an environment of earned trust between employees and employer, can meet critical productivity and quality interests of employers in clerical VDT work without creating harmful employee stress and discontent. It also suggests that empirical investigation of the fairness and trust factors represents an important and practical area of research in a macroergonomic analysis of employee monitoring programs and impacts.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 050871469

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15676847

DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(92)90008-j


Related references

Relationship between organizational justice and organizational safety climate: do fairness perceptions influence employee safety behaviour?. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 20(2): 199-211, 2014

Employees perceptions of organizational trust and service climate: a structural model combining their effects on employee satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research 31(3): 338-357, 2007

Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship?. Journal of Applied Psychology 76(6): 845-855, 1991

Strengthening affective organizational commitment: the influence of fairness perceptions of management practices and underlying employee cynicism. Health Care Manager 30(1): 29-35, 2011

Designing electronic use policies to enhance employee perceptions of fairness and to reduce cyberloafing: An empirical test of justice theory. Computers in Human Behavior 25(4): 902-910, 2009

Perceptions of Organizational Politics and Employee Citizenship Behaviors: Conscientiousness and Self-monitoring as Moderators. Journal of Business and Psychology 27(4): 395-406, 2012

Organizational factors related to safety in a psychiatric hospital: employee perceptions. Aaohn Journal 51(10): 425-432, 2003

The influence of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and fairness perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Psychology 132(3): 277-290, 1998

Employee Perceptions of Job Influence and Organizational Participation Employee Perceptions. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society 40(3): 472-489, 2001

Organizational climate and company productivity: The role of employee affect and employee level. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77(2): 193-216, 2004

Employee perceptions of performance appraisal fairness in two organizations. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement 20(2): 177-191, 1988

Fairness perceptions of supervisor feedback, LMX, and employee well-being at work. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 17(2): 198-225, 2008

Exchange fairness and employee performance: An examination of the relationship between organizational politics and procedural justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 94(1): 1-14, 2004

Organizational Factors and Perceptions of Climate in Three Psychiatric Units. Human Relations 41(5): 371-388, 1988

Organizational climate, occupational stress, and employee mental health: mediating effects of organizational efficiency. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 53(1): 34-42, 2011