+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Unreasonable expectations in emergency colorectal cancer surgery



Unreasonable expectations in emergency colorectal cancer surgery



Colorectal Disease 7(3): 275-278



The recently published ACPGBI colorectal cancer (ACPGBI CRC) scoring system for predicting operative mortality has been suggested as an instrument to improve patient consent procedures and to compare results between centres. This study compares the results of a surgical unit against the standards set by the ACPGBI colorectal cancer model and for emergency surgery, against the p-POSSUM instrument. Data for the ACPGBI CRC model were collected prospectively through 2003 at the Leicester Royal Infirmary. Additional data needed for the p-POSSUM was retrospectively collected from case records. The actual mortality was compared with that predicted by the models. Seventy-two colorectal cancer operations were performed during the study period. The observed operative mortality in elective cases was lower, and in emergency cases higher, than predicted by the ACPGBI CRC model. With emergency cases the predicted mortality using P-POSSUM was significantly higher than that using the ACPGBI CRC model, particularly in the presence of faecal contamination. The ACPGBI CRC model may be accurate for elective cases, but appears to significantly underestimate predicted mortality in the emergency setting, both actual and predicted by p-POSSUM. This may be due to a failure to incorporate adequate weighting for faecal peritonitis and the associated systemic insult into the ACPGBI model.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 050890157

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 15859967

DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2005.00784.x


Related references

Patients' expectations of colorectal surgery for cancer. Colorectal Disease 8(3): 186-191, 2006

Value of serum procalcitonin in evaluating the prognosis of sepsis in elderly patients with colorectal cancer undergoing emergency colorectal surgery. Indian Journal of Surgery 75(2): 86-93, 2013

The pattern of colorectal cancer surgery in Lithuania in 2005: do results meet expectations?. Medicina 49(3): 124-131, 2013

Early and late outcome after surgery for colorectal cancer: elective versus emergency surgery. Tumori 89(1): 36-41, 2003

Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer does not result in nodal understaging compared with elective surgery. Canadian Journal of Surgery. Journal Canadien de Chirurgie 57(5): 349-353, 2014

Self-expanding metallic stent as a bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 26(1): 110-119, 2012

Comparison of short-term outcomes after elective surgery following endoscopic stent insertion and emergency surgery for obstructive colorectal cancer. International Journal of Surgery 11(6): 442-446, 2013

A meta-analysis of endoscopic stenting as bridge to surgery versus emergency surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology 88(2): 387-403, 2013

Oncologic safety of stent as bridge to surgery compared to emergency radical surgery for left-sided colorectal cancer obstruction. Surgical Endoscopy 27(9): 3121-3128, 2013

Emergency surgery in colorectal cancer. Journal of ChemoTherapy 9(2): 142-143, 1997

Emergency surgery for colorectal cancer: our experience. Chirurgia Italiana 56(5): 661-667, 2004

CPR: avoiding unreasonable expectations. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London 29(3): 252, 1995

Does emergency surgery affect resectability of colorectal cancer?. Acta Chirurgica Belgica 108(2): 219-225, 2008

Emergency surgery for patients with colorectal cancer over 90 years of age. Hepato-Gastroenterology 49(48): 1538-1539, 2002

Patient expectations of A&E 'bordering on unreasonable'. Emergency Nurse 14(9): 2, 2007