+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Utilization of low-field MR scanners

Utilization of low-field MR scanners

Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences 3(1): 27-38

The evident advantage of high-field MR (magnetic resonance) scanners is their higher signal-to-noise ratio, which results in improved imaging. While no reliable efficacy studies exist that compare the diagnostic capabilities of low- versus high-field scanners, the adoption and acceptance of low-field MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is subject to biases. On the other hand, the cost savings associated with low-field MRI hardware are obvious. The running costs of a non-superconductive low-field scanner show even greater differences in favor of low-field scanners. Patient anxiety and safety issues also reflect the advantages of low-field scanners. Recent technological developments in the realm of low-field MR scanners will lead to higher image quality, shorter scan times, and refined imaging protocols. Interventional and intraoperative use also supports the installation of low-field MR scanners. Utilization of low-field systems has the potential to enhance overall cost reductions with little or no loss of diagnostic performance.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 050921544

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 16093617

Related references

An Active Transmit/Receive NMR Magnetometer for Field Monitoring in Ultra High Field MRI Scanners. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical Engineering 58(Suppl. 1):, 2013

MR equipment acquisition strategies: low-field or high-field scanners. European Radiology 7(Suppl. 5): 263-268, 1997

Mid-field scanners rival high-field establishment. Diagnostic Imaging Suppl Open Mri: Mr25-Mr27, 1998

Discussion on proposed guidelines on utilization of computed tomographic scanners. Journal of Computed Tomography 2(2): 171-181, 1978

CT scanners in the Brazilian Unified National Health System: installed capacity and utilization. Cadernos de Saude Publica 30(6): 1293-1304, 2014

Have the counties followed recommendations by the National Board of Health and Welfare concerning the number of MR-scanners and CT-scanners?. Ugeskrift for Laeger 165(45): 4318-4319, 2003

Performance evaluation of computerized tomographic scanners illustrative data from emi acta and delta scanners. Physics in Medicine & Biology 22(1): 123-124, 1977

Implementation of dual-source RF excitation in 3 T MR-scanners allows for nearly identical ADC values compared to 1.5 T MR scanners in the abdomen. Plos one 7(2): E32613, 2012

Performance evaluation and quality assurance of computed tomography scanners, with illustrations from the EMI, ACTA, and Delta scanners. Radiology 120(1): 173-188, 1976

Comparison of examination times between CT scanners: are the newer scanners faster?. Ajr. American Journal of Roentgenology 170(1): 13-18, 1998

Low field strength magnetic scanners. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 9(6): 1153-1154, 1985

Utilization of computed tomography scanners and the health planning issue: a process data summary. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 3(2): 256-260, 1979

Development of tunable miniature piezoelectric-based scanners validated by the combination of two scanners in a direct image relay technique. Optical Engineering 55(1):, 2016

Reflection volume holographic scanners with field-curvature corrections. Applied Optics 22(22): 3491-3499, 1983

EarLens transducer behavior in high-field strength MRI scanners. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 140(3): 426-428, 2009