+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: an evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis



Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: an evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis



International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 19(6): 457-464



To assess the validity of locally performed off-line quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) measurement in clinical trials, we carried out a comparative study between on-site QCA analysis and analysis performed at an independent external core laboratory. One local operator analyzed the pre, post and follow-up angiograms of 116 patients participating in the Stenting in Small Coronary Arteries Study (SISCA) prior to final QCA analysis in the core laboratory. The mean values of the reference diameter (RD), minimal lumen diameter (MLD) and diameter stenosis (DS) showed acceptable agreement between study site and core laboratory. However, on the level of individuals the interobserver differences were large, affecting the outcome of restenosis rate significantly, and in a such way that the conclusions in the SISCA trial might have come out differently if a core laboratory had not been used. This emphasizes the importance of using independent core laboratories in coronary interventional trials.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 050932218

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 14690184

DOI: 10.1023/b:caim.0000004327.52633.d2


Related references

Diagnostic accuracy in coronary stenosis: comparison between visual score and quantitative analysis (quantitative computed tomographic angiography) in coronary angiography by multidetector computed tomography-coronary angiography and quantitative analysis (quantitative coronary angiography) in conventional coronary angiography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 34(5): 652-659, 2010

Central Core Laboratory versus Site Interpretation of Coronary CT Angiography: Agreement and Association with Cardiovascular Events in the PROMISE Trial. Radiology: 172181-172181, 2017

Inter-core lab variability in analyzing quantitative coronary angiography for bifurcation lesions: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial. Jacc. Cardiovascular Interventions 8(2): 305-314, 2016

Meta-analysis of fractional flow reserve versus quantitative coronary angiography and noninvasive imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia. American Journal of Cardiology 99(4): 450-456, 2007

Evaluation of the coronary vasodilatory effect of nicorandil versus that of placebo by quantitative coronary angiography. Cardiovascular Drugs & Therapy 7(SUPPL 2): 455, 1993

Morphologic change in coronary artery stenosis with the Medtronic Wiktor stent: initial results from the core laboratory for quantitative angiography. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis 24(4): 237-245, 1991

Contrast enhanced multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional invasive quantitative coronary angiography in acute coronary syndrome patients-correlation and bias. Acute Cardiac Care 8(2): 99-104, 2006

SYNTAX score reproducibility and variability between interventional cardiologists, core laboratory technicians, and quantitative coronary measurements. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 4(6): 553-561, 2012

Comparison of feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography versus intravascular ultrasound for evaluation of in-stent restenosis. American Journal of Cardiology 103(10): 1349-1358, 2009

Nuclear stress perfusion imaging versus computed tomography coronary angiography for identifying patients with obstructive coronary artery disease as defined by conventional angiography: insights from the CorE-64 multicenter study. Heart International 9(1): 1-6, 2014

The impact of image resolution on computation of fractional flow reserve: coronary computed tomography angiography versus 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 32(3): 513-523, 2015

Variability in quantitative coronary angiography Higher precision by analysis in consecutive frames. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 0(SPEC ISSUE): 209A, 1994

Intrinsic variability in quantitative coronary angiography Enhancement by analysis in consecutive frames. European Heart Journal 14(ABSTR SUPPL ): 446, 1993

Comparison of video versus cinefilm for quantitative analysis of coronary angiography. European Heart Journal 15(ABSTR SUPPL ): 385, 1994

Coronary artery evaluation using 64-row multidetector computed tomography angiography (CORE-64): Results of a multicenter, international trial to assess diagnostic accuracy compared with conventional coronary angiography. 2007