+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A 10-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with an 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone



A 10-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with an 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone



Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 16(3): 435-446



There is a need for prospective, long-term follow-up studies of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation (MSFA). The aim of the present study was to determine whether deprotenized bovine bone (DPBB) used for MSFA may result in long-term stability of placed dental implants. Fourteen of the 20 patients included in the study were followed throughout the 10 years study period. These patients had 53 implants placed in 22 (6 unilateral and 8 bilateral) maxillary sinuses augmented with a mixture of 80% DPBB and 20% autogenous bone (80:20), and 15 implants placed in non-grafted sites. Clinical and radiographic examinations of the implants and grafts were performed. After 10 years of functional loading 15 of the initially placed 108 implants had been lost giving a cumulative survival rate of 86%. The mean marginal bone loss was 1.6 ± 1.0 mm. There were no statistically significant differences in marginal bone level, pocket depth, or ISQ-values between implants placed in residual or grafted bone or between smokers or non-smokers at 10 years follow-up. There was a statistically significant reduction (p < .01) in graft height between 3 months and 2 years but no further significant reduction up to 10 years. The first 2 years after placement of implants with turned surfaces placed in sites after sinus floor augmentation with DPBB and autogenous bone seem to be critical for implant survival. At 10 years follow-up, the remaining implants presented excellent clinical and radiological results regardless of smoking habits or implant sites (augmented or residual bone).

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051054534

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23066860

DOI: 10.1111/cid.12008


Related references

A 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Study of Implants Placed after Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation with an 82 Mixture of Deprotenized Bovine Bone and Autogenous Bone. 2012

A 3-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 80:20 mixture of deproteinized bovine bone and autogenous bone Clinical, radiographic and resonance frequency analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 34(3): 273-280, 2005

A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 60(3): 277-84; Discussion 285-6, 2002

A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 14(1): 41-50, 2012

A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15(3): 339-345, 2004

Clinical Outcome of Implants Placed in Staged Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using Bovine Bone Mineral Mixed with Autogenous Bone at Three Different Ratios: A 5-Year Prospective Follow-up Study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 33(21): 1351-1361, 2018

A 5-year prospective follow-up study of implant-supported fixed prostheses in patients subjected to maxillary sinus floor augmentation with an 80:20 mixture of bovine hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 6(2): 82-89, 2004

Histological and histomorphometrical analyses of biopsies harvested 11 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine and autogenous bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research 21(9): 961-970, 2010

Influence of Healing Period Upon Bone Turn Over on Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation Grafted Solely with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral: A Prospective Human Histological and Clinical Trial. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 19(2): 341-350, 2017

Volumetric changes of the graft after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss and autogenous bone in different ratios: a radiographic study in minipigs. Clinical Oral Implants Research 23(8): 902-910, 2012

A clinical histologic study of bovine hydroxyapatite in combination with autogenous bone and fibrin glue for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Results after 6 to 8 months of healing. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12(2): 135-143, 2001

Apical and marginal bone alterations around implants in maxillary sinus augmentation grafted with autogenous bone or bovine bone material and simultaneous or delayed dental implant positioning. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22(5): 485-491, 2011

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation and simultaneous implant placement using locally harvested autogenous bone chips and bone debris: a prospective clinical study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 68(4): 837-844, 2010

Volumetric dimensional changes of autogenous bone and the mixture of hydroxyapatite and autogenous bone graft in humans maxillary sinus augmentation. A multislice tomographic study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 25(11): 1251-1256, 2014

Maxillary sinus floor elevation with bovine bone mineral combined with either autogenous bone or autogenous stem cells: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research 22(3): 251-258, 2011