+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A clinical and histological case series study on calcium sulfate for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants



A clinical and histological case series study on calcium sulfate for maxillary sinus floor augmentation and delayed placement of dental implants



Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 14(2): 259-265



Maxillary sinus floor augmentation is a procedure that is indicated in cases when the volume of the posterior maxillary bone is inadequate. The goal of this treatment is to obtain sufficient amount of bone tissue in order to gain osseointegration of endosseous implants. The purpose of this study was to conduct a clinical and histological analysis of calcium sulfate (CaS) as bone graft substitute in sinus floor augmentation. Ten patients with edentulous maxillas were included in this study. They had moderate to severe atrophy of the posterior maxilla. Surgiplaster (Classimplant®, Rome, Italy) was used as graft material in the maxillary sinus and was covered by BioGide® (Geistlish Pharmaceutical, Wolhusen, Switzerland). After 4 months of graft healing, 40 dental implants were placed and a biopsy for histomorphometry was taken at these occasions. The specimens were viewed by light microscope, and the extent of bone regeneration and remaining graft material was evaluated. Radiographs were taken at the time of sinus augmentation and after 4 months of graft healing. At the time of abutment surgery, one implant was considered as a failure and was consequently removed, giving a survival rate of 97.5% after 1 year of loading. Radiographs showed a mean of 26.5% shrinkage of the augmented area. A significant resorption of CaS was noted with a mean value of 8.8% of remaining graft material after 4 months of healing. The biopsies also revealed new bone formation with a mean value of 21.2% of the total biopsy area. Histology showed signs of an acellular substitution of CaS with bone-like tissue. The results of this study show that new bone regeneration occurs in the maxillary sinus after augmentation with CaS. This enabled successful placement, integration, and loading of dental implants in the posterior maxilla, as only 1 of 40 implants was lost during 1 year of follow-up.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051101015

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 19843103

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00249.x


Related references

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using the transalveolar technique with simultaneous placement of dental implants: a 5-year clinical retrospective study. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 49(3): 161-165, 2014

Analysis of Bone Height Changes after Maxillary Sinus Augmentation with Simultaneous and Delayed Placement of Dental Implants: A Clinical and Radiographic Study. Journal of Prosthodontics 25(6): 440-445, 2016

Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation by Two-Stage Sinus Membrane Elevation Using a Titanium Bone Fixation Device and Dental Implants in a Severely Atrophic Posterior Maxilla: A Case-Series Study. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 72(9): E68-E69, 2014

A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with a 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research 15(3): 339-345, 2004

Early implant placement in bilateral sinus floor augmentation using iliac bone block grafts in severe maxillary atrophy: a clinical, histological, and radiographic case report. Journal of Oral Implantology 35(1): 37-44, 2009

Implants placed simultaneously with maxillary sinus floor augmentation in the presence of antral pseudocysts: Presentation of a case series. Quintessence International 49(6): 479-485, 2018

A prospective 1-year clinical and radiographic study of implants placed after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with synthetic biphasic calcium phosphate or deproteinized bovine bone. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 14(1): 41-50, 2012

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings. Clinical Oral Implants Research 12(3): 270-278, 2001

Maxillary sinus functions and complications with lateral window and osteotome sinus floor elevation procedures followed by dental implants placement: a retrospective study in 60 patients. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 14(3): 405-413, 2013

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using a nano-crystalline hydroxyapatite silica gel: case series and 3-month preliminary histological results. Annals of Anatomy 194(2): 174-178, 2012

Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 21(5): 475-485, 2001

Clinical observation on simultaneous floor bone graft of maxillary sinus and placement of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants. Hunan Yike Daxue Xuebao 21(5): 410-412, 1996

Prospective study on the augmentation of the maxillary sinus with calcium sulfate: histological results. Journal of Periodontology 71(6): 940-947, 2000

Case series of maxillary sinus augmentation with biphasic calcium phosphate: a clinical and radiographic study. Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science 41(2): 98, 2011

Sinus membrane elevation and simultaneous insertion of dental implants: a new surgical technique in maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Periodontology 2000 47: 193-205, 2008