EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,214,146
Abstracts:
29,074,682
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on Google+Follow on Google+
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

A cognitive analysis of college students' explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse


Archives of Sexual Behavior 39(5): 1121-1131
A cognitive analysis of college students' explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual intercourse
Young adults, including college students, engage in high levels of unprotected sexual activity despite relatively high rates of HIV/STI and pregnancy-related knowledge. Little is known about the cognitive strategies that young people use to explain this inconsistency. The current study examined young people's explanations for engaging in unprotected sexual activity in their committed relationships. A total of 63 young adults (32 women and 31 men) completed daily diaries over a 3-week period, providing a total of 1,284 daily reports tracking their condom use and non-use during intercourse. Diary collection was followed by in-depth interviews designed to explore participants' decision-making regarding their participation in sexual intercourse unprotected against infection or unwanted pregnancy. Less than a quarter of the sample used condoms or oral contraceptives consistently. Participants primarily viewed condoms as a means of preventing pregnancy; few described disease prevention as a main motivation for their use. Analysis of the cognitions underlying explanations for condom and contraception non-use were classified as (1) general biased risk evaluation, (2) biased evidence evaluation, (3) endorsement of poor alternatives, (4) focus on spurious justifications, (5) dismissing risk, and (6) ignoring risk. Prevention interventions should incorporate methods to challenge young people to acknowledge personal risk and commit themselves to taking steps to reduce this risk.

(PDF same-day service: $19.90)

Accession: 051103160

PMID: 19365717

DOI: 10.1007/s10508-009-9493-7



Related references

Prevalence of unprotected anal intercourse and unprotected vaginal intercourse among HIV-positive men who have sex with men in China: a meta-analysis. Sexually Transmitted Infections 88(3): 229-233, 2012

Are Nepali students at risk of HIV? A cross-sectional study of condom use at first sexual intercourse among college students in Kathmandu. Journal of the International Aids Society 13(): 7-7, 2010

Unprotected Intercourse and One-Night Stands: Impact of Sexual Excitation, Sexual Inhibition, and Atypical Sexual Arousal Patterns on Risky Sexual Behaviors in Women. Journal of Sexual Medicine 13(3): 361-373, 2016

The relationship between first sexual intercourse and ways of handling contraception among college students. Journal of the American College Health Association 24(2): 106-111, 1975

Making decisions about sexual intercourse: capturing college students' policies. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 19(1): 101-120, 1997

Predictors of preference for alcohol use with sexual intercourse among white and African American college students. ELEVENTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AIDS [Author] Eleventh International Conference on AIDS, Vol One One world: One hope : 178, 1996

The role of sexual arousal and sexual partner characteristics in HIV+ MSM's intentions to engage in unprotected sexual intercourse. Health Psychology 27(4): 445-454, 2008

Intoxication at last sexual intercourse and unprotected sex among HIV-positive and HIV-negative individuals in Uganda: an event-level analysis. Aids and Behavior 19(3): 412-421, 2015

Forced sexual intercourse and associated health-risk behaviors among female college students in the United States. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67(2): 252-259, 1999

Study on the characteristics of sexual intercourse debut and its influencing factors among college students in 18 provinces in China. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi 32(2): 134-137, 2013