+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?

A comparative direct cost analysis of pediatric urologic robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery: could robot-assisted surgery be less expensive?

Journal of Endourology 26(7): 871-877

Cost in healthcare is an increasing and justifiable concern that impacts decisions about the introduction of new devices such as the da Vinci(®) surgical robot. Because equipment expenses represent only a portion of overall medical costs, we set out to make more specific cost comparisons between open and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. We performed a retrospective, observational, matched cohort study of 146 pediatric patients undergoing either open or robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery from October 2004 to September 2009 at a single institution. Patients were matched based on surgery type, age, and fiscal year. Direct internal costs from the institution were used to compare the two surgery types across several procedures. Robot-assisted surgery direct costs were 11.9% (P=0.03) lower than open surgery. This cost difference was primarily because of the difference in hospital length of stay between patients undergoing open vs robot-assisted surgery (3.8 vs 1.6 days, P<0.001). Maintenance fees and equipment expenses were the primary contributors to robotic surgery costs, while open surgery costs were affected most by room and board expenses. When estimates of the indirect costs of robot purchase and maintenance were included, open surgery had a lower total cost. There were no differences in follow-up times or complication rates. Direct costs for robot-assisted surgery were significantly lower than equivalent open surgery. Factors reducing robot-assisted surgery costs included: A consistent and trained robotic surgery team, an extensive history of performing urologic robotic surgery, selection of patients for robotic surgery who otherwise would have had longer hospital stays after open surgery, and selection of procedures without a laparoscopic alternative. The high indirect costs of robot purchase and maintenance remain major factors, but could be overcome by high surgical volume and reduced prices as competitors enter the market.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051106472

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22283146

DOI: 10.1089/end.2011.0584

Related references

Robot-assisted surgery - Progress or expensive toy? : Matched-pair comparative analysis of robot-assisted cholecystectomy vs. laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift für Alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen 88(12): 1040-1045, 2017

Comparison of robot-assisted surgery, laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and open surgery for the treatment of colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis. Medicine 97(34): E11817, 2018

A comparative cost analysis of robotic-assisted surgery (Rs) versus laparoscopic surgery (Ls) and open surgery (Os) in a paediatric hospital. European Urology Suppl.s 14(2): e605-e605a, 2015

A comparative cost analysis of robotic-assisted surgery versus laparoscopic surgery and open surgery: the necessity of investing knowledgeably. Surgical Endoscopy 30(11): 5044-5051, 2016

A Retrospective Comparison of Anesthetic Management in Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Surgery versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology. The Journal of Japan Society for Clinical Anesthesia 35(3): 295-300, 2015

Prostatectomy-pros and cons on open surgery/laparoscopic surgery/robot-assisted surgery. Gan to Kagaku Ryoho. Cancer and ChemoTherapy 38(13): 2542-2547, 2012

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One 13(1): E0191628, 2018

Robot-assisted surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 142(10): 2173-2183, 2017

Robot-assisted surgery compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery. Cadth Technology Overviews 2(2): E2203, 2012

Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy 30(12): 5601-5614, 2016

Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 17(3): 171-174, 2007

Robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery. Medicine and Health, Rhode Island 92(10): 327-330, 2009

Pediatric Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Dismembered Pyeloplasty: Comparison With a Cohort of Open Surgery. Yearbook of Urology 2006: 273-274, 2006

Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. Journal of Urology 175(2): 683-7; Discussion 687, 2006

Comparative analysis of global practice patterns in urologic robot-assisted surgery. Journal of Endourology 24(10): 1637-1644, 2011