+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of subpedicle acellular dermal matrix allograft with subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of isolated marginal tissue recession: A clinical study



A comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of subpedicle acellular dermal matrix allograft with subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of isolated marginal tissue recession: A clinical study



Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 17(1): 78-81



The most common problem encountered in our day to day practice is exposed root surface or a tooth getting long. The main indication for root coverage procedures are esthetics and/or cosmetic demands followed by the management of root hypersensitivity, root caries or when it hampers proper plaque removal. Over the years, various techniques have been used to achieve root coverage. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of subpedicle acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) with subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) in the treatment of isolated marginal tissue recession. Twenty systemically healthy patients aged between 18 to 50 years (mean age29.7±4.35 years) with a recession defect on the labial and the buccal surfaces of any teeth were selected for the study. Ten patients received the test treatment (ADMA), ten patients received the control treatment (SCTG). Clinical recordings assessed at baseline, three months and six months post surgery, included Plaque index (PI), Papillary bleeding index (PBI), Gingival recession (REC), Probing pocket depth (PPD), Clinical attachment level (CAL) and Width of keratinized gingival (WKG). Test group (ADMA) showed 86.93% mean root coverage while control group (SCTG) showed 84.72% at six months post surgery. Mean increase in the width of keratinized gingiva was significantly greater in the SCTG group (3.3±0.48mm) compared to ADMA group (2.4±0.51mm). Both the treatment produced a significant reduction in gingival recession and probing pocket depth and significant gain in clinical attachment level and width of keratinised gingiva.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 051106635

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23633778


Related references

Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. Journal of Periodontology 72(11): 1477-1484, 2002

Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 7(2): 63-70, 2006

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue to coronally advanced flap alone in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: A clinical study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 19(5): 537-544, 2015

Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study. Journal of Periodontology 73(11): 1299-1307, 2002

A comparative 6-month clinical study of acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage. Journal of Dentistry 7(3): 156-164, 2010

Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. Journal of Periodontology 73(12): 1405-1411, 2003

Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 38(12): 1122-1129, 2012

Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes. Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology 10(3): 87-94, 2008

A comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 16(3): 411-416, 2012

A comparative clinical study of the efficacy of subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft in root coverage: 6-month follow-up observation. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 17(4): 478-483, 2013

Implant associated soft tissue defects in the anterior maxilla: a randomized control trial comparing subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dentistry 23(4): 416-425, 2016

Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix allograft in the treatment of multiple marginal gingival recession defects. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry 33(3): E88-E94, 2014

Clinical evaluation of subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration for treatment of Miller's class 1 gingival recession (comparative, split mouth, six months study). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry 6(3): E218-E224, 2014

Treatment of amalgam tattoo with a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix. Journal of the International Academy of Periodontology 16(2): 50-54, 2014

Comparative clinical evaluation of laterally positioned pedicle graft and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of Miller's Class I and II gingival recession: A 6 months study. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology 19(6): 659-664, 2016