+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparative retrospective study of immediately loaded implants in postextraction sites versus healed sites: results after 6 to 7 years in the maxilla



A comparative retrospective study of immediately loaded implants in postextraction sites versus healed sites: results after 6 to 7 years in the maxilla



International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 26(2): 373-384



Immediate loading has become an emerging technique because it has been shown to be a successful, time-saving procedure. Recently, immediate loading has been performed simultaneously with implant placement into fresh extraction sockets; excellent results have been achieved, but few reports are available with a long-term follow-up. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the difference in success rates in the maxilla between postextraction implants and implants placed in healed sites, both of which were immediately loaded, after a long-term follow-up. Between October 2001 and February 2003, 239 implants were inserted in 81 consecutively operated patients and immediately loaded; 138 implants were placed in fresh postextraction sites (57.7%) and 101 implants were placed in healed sites (42.3%). Two different implant systems were used in this study. Each implant was loaded within 72 hours of placement (60.3% at the time of surgery, 6.3% after 24 hours, 30.1% after 48 hours, and 3.3% after 72 hours). Preestablished success criteria were used to evaluate the success rate of the implants. The mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range: 6.0 to 7.3 years). Only 8 of the 239 implants failed, for an overall success rate of 96.6%. Six of the failed implants were inserted in postextraction sites, and 2 had been placed in healed sites; the success rates were 95.7% and 98.0%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between postextraction and healed sites. Immediate loading of immediate postextraction sites results in an implant success rate that is broadly comparable to that seen for implants placed in healed sites. Moreover, this procedure can provide predictable and favorable results in many different clinical conditions and for a long term.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 051106903

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21483891


Related references

Aesthetic outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets and healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a retrospective study on 103 patients with 3 years of follow-up. Clinical Oral Implants Research (): -, 2016

Clinical, aesthetic, and patient-related outcome of immediately loaded single implants in the anterior maxilla: a prospective study in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 15(6): 819-835, 2013

Evaluation of the esthetic results of 64 nonfunctional immediately loaded postextraction implants in the maxilla: correlation between interproximal alveolar crest and soft tissues at 3 years of follow-up. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 15(1): 130-142, 2013

Immediate provisionalisation of single post-extractive implants versus implants placed in healed sites in the anterior maxilla: 1-year results from a multicentre controlled cohort study. European Journal of Oral Implantology 6(3): 285-295, 2013

Immediately loaded distally cantilevered fixed mandibular prostheses supported by four implants placed in both in fresh extraction and healed sites: 2-year results from a prospective study. European Journal of Oral Implantology 7(2): 173-184, 2014

Evaluation of the clinical and aesthetic outcomes of Straumann(®) Standard Plus implants supported single crowns placed in non-augmented healed sites in the anterior maxilla: a 5-8 years retrospective study. Clinical Oral Implants Research 27(1): 106-112, 2016

Immediate versus conventional loading for the maxilla with implants placed into fresh and healed extraction sites to support a full-arch fixed prosthesis: nonrandomized controlled clinical study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 28(4): 1116-1124, 2014

Immediate Loading of Tapered Implants Placed in Postextraction Sockets and Healed Sites. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 27(5): 1220-1227, 2016

Correlation between insertion torque and survival rates in immediately loaded implants in the maxilla: a retrospective study. Implant Dentistry 22(3): 250-254, 2013

Primary and Secondary Stability of Implants in Postextraction and Healed Sites: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 31(6): 1435-1443, 2017

Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible with immediately loaded implants: preliminary data from a retrospective study, considering time of implantation. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 26(1): 139-147, 2011

Effect of radiotherapy on osseointegration of dental implants immediately placed in postextraction sites of minipigs mandibles. Implant Dentistry 23(5): 560-564, 2014

Clinical, radiographic, and esthetic evaluation of immediately loaded laser microtextured implants placed into fresh extraction sockets in the anterior maxilla: a 2-year retrospective multicentric study. Implant Dentistry 23(2): 144-154, 2014

Long-term results of immediately loaded fast bone regeneration-coated implants placed in fresh extraction sites in the upper jaw. Journal of Oral Implantology 36(4): 251-261, 2010

A retrospective analysis of immediately placed implants in 418 sites exhibiting periapical pathology: results and clinical considerations. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 27(1): 194-202, 2012