+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparative study of perfusion measurement in brain tumours at 3 Tesla MR: Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI



A comparative study of perfusion measurement in brain tumours at 3 Tesla MR: Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI



European Neurology 64(1): 21-26



To prove the feasibility of arterial spin labeling (ASL) to explore brain tumors by comparing dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI to ASL at 3T MR. Twenty-seven patients were included presenting 9 gliomas, 10 metastases and 8 meningiomas. All were explored by a pseudo-continuous ASL and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced T2* perfusion sequence. Two neuroradiologists analyzed the cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps to assess feasibility, examination quality and quantitative comparison. The Spearman nonparametric correlation test and the Bland-Altman graphic test were used to analyze our quantitative results. 92% of ASL CBF maps were informative. ASL detected all lesions as well as dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. Both sequences provide relative quantitative CBF values closely correlated. On a 3T MR unit, ASL is a good alternative to dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI when contrast medium is contraindicated or intravenous injection is not possible. Its results on relative CBF parameters are similar to contrast-injected perfusion.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051107795

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 20558984

DOI: 10.1159/000311520


Related references

Comparative analysis of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging for quantitative perfusion measurements of brain tumors. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology 7(6): 2790-2799, 2014

Assessment of Irradiated Brain Metastases by Means of Arterial Spin-Labeling and Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion Mri. Investigative Radiology 39(5): 277-287, 2004

Comparison of arterial spin-labeling techniques and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI in perfusion imaging of normal brain tissue. Investigative Radiology 38(11): 712-718, 2003

Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 52(4): 307-317, 2010

Assessment of irradiated brain metastases by means of arterial spin-labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI: initial results. Investigative Radiology 39(5): 277-287, 2004

Quantitative measurement of blood flow in paediatric brain tumours-a comparative study of dynamic susceptibility contrast and multi time-point arterial spin labelled MRI. British Journal of Radiology 89(1062): 20150624, 2016

Op04 * Quantitative Measurement Of Blood Flow In Paediatric Brain Tumours - A Comparative Study Of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast And Multi-Timepoint Arterial Spin Label Imaging. Neuro-Oncology 16(Suppl 6): vi16, 2014

Renal perfusion 3-T MR imaging: a comparative study of arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques. Radiology 261(3): 845-853, 2011

Correlation of 3D Arterial Spin Labeling and Multi-Parametric Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI in Brain Tumors. Journal of Medical Investigation 63(3-4): 175-181, 2016

Brain tumor perfusion: comparison of dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using T1, T2, and T2* contrast, pulsed arterial spin labeling, and H2(15)O positron emission tomography. European Journal of Radiology 70(3): 465-474, 2009

Arterial spin labeling at 3.0 Tesla in subacute ischemia: comparison to dynamic susceptibility perfusion. Clinical Neuroradiology 22(1): 29-37, 2012

Perfusion imaging of meningioma by using continuous arterial spin-labeling: comparison with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR images and histopathologic features. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 27(1): 85-93, 2006

Can arterial spin labelling really replace dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion techniques for assessing brain tumours in clinical practice?. Neurology India 65(5): 977-978, 2017

Measurement of brain perfusion in newborns: pulsed arterial spin labeling (PASL) versus pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL). Neuroimage. Clinical 6: 126-133, 2014

Comparative evaluation of 3-dimensional pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling with dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in grading of human glioma. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 37(3): 321-326, 2013