+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction



A comparison between single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction



Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 88(Suppl. 2): S56-S62



To compare the efficacy and safety of a single dose of 50 microg oral misoprostol with 25 microg vaginal misoprostol for labor induction. This study was a randomized, double-blind controlled trial conducting in pregnant women admitted at delivery room, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Medical College and Vajira Hospital between March 2002 and January 2005. All 146 pregnancies at > or = 37 weeks' gestation who had indication for labor induction with unfavorable cervix were randomly divided into a group of single dose of 50 microg misoprostol orally or 25 microg misoprostol vaginally. Initial and six hours after misoprostol administration, Bishop scores were evaluated. Requirement of oxytocin augmentation, complication due to uterine hypertonus, incidence of vaginal delivery, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes, and number of neonate admitted at neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) were recorded. The baseline characteristics and median initial Bishop scores were comparable in both groups. At 6 hours after misoprostol administration the median cervical changes of women who received oral or vaginal misoprostol were statistically significant different, 3 and 4, respectively. The median time interval to vaginal delivery of women who received oral misoprostol was significantly longer than of those who had vaginal drug, 16.9 and 11.8 hours respectively. Comparable neonatal outcomes were found in both groups in terms of assigned Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes. A single dose of 25 microg vaginal misoprostol appears to be more effective than 50 microg oral dose in improving Bishop scores and decreasing the time to vaginal delivery in women with unfavorable cervix without severe adverse effects.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 051109162

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17722318


Related references

Oral misoprostol (100 microg) versus vaginal misoprostol (25 microg) in term labor induction: a randomized comparison. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 82(12): 1103-1106, 2003

Labor induction at term: a comparison of the effects of 50 microg and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 34(2): 102-105, 2007

Randomized comparison of vaginal (200 microg every 3 h) and oral (400 microg every 3 h) misoprostol when combined with mifepristone in termination of second trimester pregnancy. Human Reproduction 15(10): 2205-2208, 2000

Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor: 25 vs. 50 microg dose regimen. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 72(1): 25-30, 2001

A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 83(9): 1026-1034, 2000

No benefit, but increased harm from high dose (100 microg) misoprostol for induction of labour: a randomised trial of high vs. low (50 microg) dose misoprostol. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 22(6): 614-617, 2002

Pre-induction cervical ripening with 25 microg and 50 microg vaginal misoprostol in 181 nulliparous parturients. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 22(3): 265-268, 2009

Labor induction with 25 microg versus 50 microg intravaginal misoprostol: a systematic review. Obstetrics and Gynecology 99(1): 145-151, 2002

Cervical ripening and labor induction with 25 microg vs. 50 microg of intravaginal misoprostol. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics 90(3): 234-235, 2005

A comparison of vaginal misoprostol 800 microg versus 400 microg for anembryonic pregnancy: a randomized comparative trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 88(Suppl. 2): S41-S47, 2005

A comparison of vaginal misoprostol 800 microg versus 400 microg in early pregnancy failure: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 87(Suppl. 3): S18-S23, 2004

Labor induction with 25-microg misoprostol vaginal capsules. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 68(4): 272-275, 2009

Second-trimester pregnancy termination with 600-microg vs. 400-microg vaginal misoprostol and systematic curettage postexpulsion: a randomized trial. Contraception 77(1): 50-55, 2008

Termination of pregnancies of <6 weeks gestation with a single dose of 800 microg of vaginal misoprostol. Contraception 61(1): 47-50, 2000

Induction of labor with 50 and 100 microg of misoprostol: comparison of maternal and fetal outcomes. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 113(1): 41-44, 2004