+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss



A comparison of auditory brain stem responses elicited by click and chirp stimuli in adults with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss



Ear and Hearing 35(2): 271-282



The aim of this study was to compare the human auditory brain stem response (ABR) elicited by clicks and chirps with overall behavioral hearing thresholds in participants with normal hearing and with sensory hearing loss. The authors hypothesized that ABRs to chirps would be more robust and that thresholds would be more similar to overall behavioral hearing thresholds compared with ABRs to clicks. Twenty-five adults with normal hearing and 25 adults with sensory hearing loss were recruited. Subjects were without middle ear or neurological pathologies at the time of testing. Subjects with sensory hearing loss were separated into mild to moderate hearing loss and mild to severe hearing loss groups. Behavioral hearing thresholds for pure tones were obtained at nine octave and interoctave frequencies ranging from 250 to 8000 Hz; an average of these nine frequencies was calculated for each participant. Evoked potential thresholds were measured by ABRs to click and chirp stimuli. Analyses included wave V absolute latencies and wave V peak-to-peak amplitudes. Thresholds for ABRs to clicks and chirps were compared with each other and with overall behavioral hearing thresholds. ABR thresholds to chirp and click stimuli did not differ significantly for either the normal-hearing or the hearing loss groups. Wave V peak-to-peak amplitude was higher for chirps than clicks, particularly at lower intensities, for all groups. ABR thresholds to chirps were closer to overall behavioral thresholds than clicks in all groups. Moreover, ABR thresholds to chirps did not differ significantly from behavioral thresholds in the two hearing loss groups. ABRs obtained with chirp stimuli provide an efficient method for estimating hearing thresholds in individuals with normal hearing and sensory hearing loss where broadband signals are selected for testing. ABRs to chirps display higher peak-to-peak amplitudes than those obtained with clicks and may provide responses closer to behavioral thresholds. This information could result in improved accuracy in identifying hearing loss and estimating hearing sensitivity for broadband signals in infants, children, and difficult-to-test older populations.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051109882

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24441741

DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3182a99cf2


Related references

Auditory brainstem responses to CE-Chirp® stimuli for normal ears and those with sensorineural hearing loss. International Journal of Audiology 54(10): 700-704, 2016

Thresholds for auditory brain stem responses to tones in notched noise from infants and young children with normal hearing or sensorineural hearing loss. Ear and Hearing 16(4): 361-371, 1995

Multiple auditory steady-state responses in children and adults with normal hearing, sensorineural hearing loss, or auditory neuropathy. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology 115(4): 268-276, 2006

Auditory Evoked Responses in Older Adults With Normal Hearing, Untreated, and Treated Age-Related Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing 2019, 2019

Comparison of pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in subjects with normal hearing and hearing loss. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 267(1): 43-49, 2011

Neonate Auditory Brainstem Responses to CE-Chirp and CE-Chirp Octave Band Stimuli I: Versus Click and Tone Burst Stimuli. Ear and Hearing 37(6): 710-723, 2016

The Effect of Signal to Noise Ratio on Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials Elicited to Speech Stimuli in Infants and Adults With Normal Hearing. Ear and Hearing 39(2): 305-317, 2017

Interaction of click intensity and cochlear hearing loss on auditory brain stem response wave V latency. Ear and Hearing 13(1): 28-34, 1992

Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Auris, Nasus, Larynx 36(2): 140-145, 2008

Auditory steady-state responses to MM and exponential envelope AM(2)/FM stimuli in normal-hearing adults. International Journal of Audiology 46(8): 399-406, 2007

The ASSR: clinical application in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired infants and adults, comparison with the click-evoked ABR and pure-tone audiometry. International Journal of Audiology 45(5): 281-286, 2006

The clinical value of the multiple-frequency 80-Hz auditory steady-state response in adults with normal hearing and hearing loss. Archives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 135(5): 496-506, 2009

Multiple auditory steady-state responses to bone-conduction stimuli in adults with normal hearing. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16(3): 172-183, 2005

Auditory steady-state responses in babies with normal hearing and with temporary conductive hearing loss. Audiological Medicine 9(1): 26-32, 2011

Auditory brainstem response to bone-conducted clicks in adults and infants with normal hearing and conductive hearing loss. Scandinavian Audiology 24(3): 185-191, 1995