+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of outcomes associated with carotid artery stent placement performed within and outside clinical trials in the United States



A comparison of outcomes associated with carotid artery stent placement performed within and outside clinical trials in the United States



Journal of Vascular Surgery 56(2): 317-323



A discrepancy between characteristics of patients treated with carotid angioplasty and stent placement (CAS) within and outside clinical trials, particularly characteristics with direct impact on clinical outcome, may limit generalization of clinical trial results. The objective of this study was to identify differences in demographic and clinical characteristics and outcomes related to CAS in patients treated within clinical trials and those treated outside clinical trials in a large national cohort. We determined the frequency of CAS performed within and outside clinical trials and associated in-hospital outcomes using data from the Nationwide Inpatient Survey data files from 2005 to 2009. All the in-hospital outcomes were analyzed after adjusting for potential confounders using multivariate analysis. Of the 81,638 patients who underwent CAS, 16,078 (19.6%) underwent the procedure as part of a clinical trial. The mean age of the patients was significantly lower in patients treated with CAS as part of a clinical trial than those treated with CAS outside a clinical trial. The proportion of women and nonwhites was lower among patients treated with CAS as part of a clinical trial. The in-hospital mortality was two-fold higher among patients treated with CAS outside clinical trials (1.12% vs 0.53%; P = .0005). The rate of composite endpoint of stroke, cardiac events, and death was significantly higher among patients treated with CAS outside clinical trials (P = .02). After adjusting for age, gender, presence of renal failure, and hospital bed size, CAS performed as part of a clinical trial was associated with lower rates of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 0.467; 95% confidence interval, 0.290-0.751; P = .0017) and composite endpoint of stroke, cardiac events, and death (odds ratio, 0.752; 95% confidence interval, 0.594-0.952; P = .0180). Our results suggest that CAS procedures performed as part of clinical trials was associated with lower rates of in-hospital mortality and composite endpoint of stroke, cardiac events, and death in United States. These findings highlight the need for strategies that ensure appropriate adoption of CAS to ensure that the benefits observed in clinical trials can be replicated in general practice.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051111799

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22560333

DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.030


Related references

Effect of Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial Results on the Performance of Carotid Artery Stent Placement and Carotid Endarterectomy in the United States. Neurosurgery 77(5): 726, 2015

Does current practice in the United States of carotid artery stent placement benefit asymptomatic octogenarians?. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 32(1): 170-173, 2011

Postprocedural hypotension after carotid artery stent placement: predictors and short- and long-term clinical outcomes. Radiology 215(3): 677-683, 2000

Long-term outcomes after carotid stent placement treatment of carotid artery dissection. Neurosurgery 45(6): 1368-73; Discussion 1373-4, 1999

Long-term outcomes after carotid stent placement for treatment of carotid artery dissection. Neurosurgery 45(6): 1368-1374, 1999

Thirty day results of 227 consecutive carotid stent procedures performed in carotid stenting clinical trials. Journal of Neurointerventional Surgery 1(2): 154-158, 2009

Comparison of trends and outcomes of carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy in the United States, 2001 to 2010. Circulation. Cardiovascular Interventions 7(5): 692-700, 2014

Comparison of stent free cell area and cerebral lesions after unprotected carotid artery stent placement. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 43(1): 10-14, 2012

Carotid endarterectomy was performed with lower stroke and death rates than carotid artery stenting in the United States in 2003 and 2004. Journal of Vascular Surgery 46(6): 1112-1118, 2007

One-year cognitive outcomes associated with carotid artery stent placement. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology 21(7): 983, 2010

Comments regarding 'Comparison of stent free cell area and cerebral lesions after unprotected carotid artery stent placement'. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 43(1): 15-15, 2012

Manual external carotid artery manipulation for failed device advance through the stent in carotid artery stent placement. A technical note. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Neurology 6(2): 52-55, 2013

Update on current registries and trials of carotid artery angioplasty and stent placement. Neurosurgical Focus 18(1): E2, 2005

Two-year clinical outcomes after large coronary stent (4.0 mm) placement: comparison of bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent. Clinical Cardiology 33(10): 620-625, 2010

Comparative Outcomes of Carotid Artery Stent Placement and Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and End-Stage Renal Disease. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 25(7): 1721-1727, 2016