+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A comparison of proximal femoral locking compression plates with dynamic hip screws in extracapsular femoral fractures



A comparison of proximal femoral locking compression plates with dynamic hip screws in extracapsular femoral fractures



Orthopaedics and Traumatology Surgery and Research 100(6): 663-668



The potential value of proximal femoral locking compression plate (PFLCP) for extracapsular femoral fractures has been discussed in several case reports; however, clinical control studies are lacking. Therefore, we performed a case control study to assess: (1) If PFLCP offers better functional results and fewer complications than dynamic hip screws (DHS)? (2) Which kind of extracapsular femoral fractures would benefit from PFLCP fixation? The PFLCP fixation offers better functional results and fewer complications than the DHS for the treatment of extracapsular fractures. A total of 83 patients with extracapsular femoral fractures were recruited. Forty-one patients underwent PFLCP fixation, and 42 patients underwent DHS fixation. Patient information, operative time, blood loss, functional level (as assessed by Sanders' traumatic hip rating scale), bone union, and implant complications were compared for the two treatment groups. Patients with stable intertrochanteric fractures who underwent PFLCP fixation demonstrated shorter bone union time than the DHS fixation group (3.3 ± 0.2 vs. 4.3 ± 0.1 month; P<0.0001); however, both groups had 100% bone union and good to excellent scores on Sanders' traumatic hip rating scale (P=1.000). Patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures who underwent PFLCP fixation experienced greater blood loss (619.0 ± 23.9 vs. 474.1 ± 19.8 ml; P<0.0001), which was mainly due to the need for open reduction (64.3% vs. 12.5%; P=0.003), compared to the DHS fixation group. No differences were identified with respect to bony union, functional level, or complications. Patients with subtrochanteric fractures who underwent PFLCP fixation demonstrated significantly shorter operative times (82.1 ± 4.3 vs. 102.2 ± 2.2 minutes; P<0.0001), less blood loss (751.8 ± 25.4 vs. 987.6 ± 32.0 ml; P<0.0001), shorter bone union times (5.2 ± 0.4 vs. 8.8 ± 1.0 month; P=0.006), more good to excellent Sanders' traumatic hip rating scale scores (92.9% vs. 55.5%; P=0.009), and fewer complications (14.2% vs. 66.6%; P=0.005) than the DHS fixation group. PFLCP fixation offers better functional outcomes and fewer complications for subtrochanteric femoral fractures but not for intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Case control study, level III.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051112153

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25155090

DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.06.012


Related references

Minimally invasive management of unstable proximal femoral extracapsular fractures using reverse LISS femoral locking plates. Hip International 19(2): 141-147, 2009

Minimally Invasive Management of Unstable Proximal Femoral Extracapsular Fractures using Reverse Liss Femoral Locking Plates. Hip International 19(2): 141-147, 2009

A biomechanical comparison of proximal femoral nails and locking proximal anatomic femoral plates in femoral fracture fixation: A study on synthetic bones. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 49(3): 347-351, 2015

Evaluation of proximal femoral locking plate in unstable extracapsular proximal femoral fractures: Surgical technique & mid term follow up results. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma 5(3): 137-145, 2014

Comparison of proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) with AO dynamic condylar screws (DCS) for the treatment for unstable peritrochanteric femoral fractures. European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology 24(3): 347-352, 2014

Proximal femoral locking plate with cannulated screws for the treatment of femoral neck fractures. Orthopedics 35(1): E1-E5, 2012

Effectiveness comparison of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and locking compression plate for intertrochanteric fractures with lateral unsubstantial femoral wall in elderly patients. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi 28(10): 1199-1203, 2014

Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 23(9): 628-633, 2009

The use of LISS femoral locking plates and cabling in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures around stable proximal femoral implants in elderly patients. Hip International 18(3): 207-211, 2008

A comparative study of proximal femoral locking compress plate, proximal femoral nail antirotation and dynamic hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 22(1 Suppl): 119-123, 2018

Reverse distal femoral locking compression plate a salvage option in nonunion of proximal femoral fractures. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 51(3): 347-348, 2017

Reverse distal femoral locking compression plate a salvage option in nonunion of proximal femoral fractures. Indian Journal of Orthopaedics 50(4): 374-378, 2016

Proximal femoral locking compression plate for proximal femoral fractures. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery 22(3): 287-293, 2014

Management of unstable pertrochanteric fractures with proximal femoral locking compression plates and affect of neck-shaft angle on functional outcomes. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma 8(3): 209-214, 2017

Proximal femoral nails compared with reverse distal femoral locking plates in intertrochanteric fractures with a compromised lateral wall; a randomised controlled trial. International Orthopaedics 38(7): 1443-1449, 2014