+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissues



A controlled clinical trial of the effects of the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances on the hard and soft tissues



European Journal of Orthodontics 29(3): 272-282



The aim of this controlled trial was to identify and quantify skeletal, soft tissue and dental changes during treatment, and immediately post-treatment with Twin Block (TB) or Dynamax appliance using the techniques of three-dimensional (3D)optical surface laser scanning, cephalometric, and clinical measurements. Sixty-two Caucasian subjects, 36 males aged 11-14 years and 26 females aged 10-13 years were enrolled in the study. The patients were placed in two groups, matched for gender and age and subsequently allocated randomly for treatment with either a TB or Dynamax appliance. Active treatment lasted 9 months followed by 3 months' post-treatment observation. Laser scanning and clinical measurements were taken at 3-monthly intervals and final cephalometric records after 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-rank tests. The non-compliance rates were the same for both groups (9 per cent), but a greater incidence of breakages was found in the Dynamax group. The TB was found to produce slightly more antero-posterior skeletal change, median ANB reduction, TB=2 degrees, Dynamax 1.1 degree (P=0.006), and similar forward movements of the chin and was associated with larger increases in the vertical facial dimension, median total anterior face height increase; TB=3.2 mm, Dynamax = 2.8 mm (P=0.03). The soft tissue vertical cephalometric increases were 3.6 mm with the TB, 2.0 mm with the Dynamax (P=0.036), and with laser scanning 5.05 and 2.6 mm, respectively, a difference which is likely to be more clinically relevant. The median post-treatment changes in soft tissue pogonion were -0.65 mm in the TB and +0.22 mm in the Dynamax group. The optical surface scanning mark and measure system is a valid method for quantifying soft tissue changes.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051119255

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17456506

DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjm004


Related references

An extended period of functional appliance therapy: a controlled clinical trial comparing the Twin Block and Dynamax appliances. European Journal of Orthodontics 36(5): 512-521, 2014

Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 138(2): 144.E1-9; Discussion 144-5, 2010

Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 127(4): 465-72; Quiz 517, 2005

Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 127(4): 473-482, 2005

A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I--The hard tissues. European Journal of Orthodontics 20(5): 501-516, 1998

A prospective evaluation of bass, bionator and twin block appliances. Part I - the hard tissues. The European Journal of Orthodontics 20(5): 501-516, 1998

A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part II--The soft tissues. European Journal of Orthodontics 20(6): 663-684, 1998

Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 124(2): 128-137, 2003

Soft tissue effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy. European Journal of Orthodontics 35(1): 71-81, 2013

Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. International Journal of Orthodontics 25(4): 57-62, 2014

The effect of healing abutment reconnection and disconnection on soft and hard peri-implant tissues: a short-term randomized controlled clinical trial. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 28(3): 807-814, 2014

Comparison between Classic Twin-block and a Modified Clear Twin-block in Class II, Division 1 Malocclusions: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice 19(12): 1455-1462, 2018

Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated using Twin Block appliances: finite-element scaling analysis. European Journal of Orthodontics 25(3): 225-230, 2003

Morphospatial analysis of soft-tissue profile in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion treated using twin block appliances: geometric morphometrics. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research 5(1): 38-50, 2002

Incremental versus maximum bite advancement during twin-block therapy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 126(5): 583-588, 2004