+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of labor



A meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of labor



Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 37(1): 4-12



To determine which method of pushing-passive descent or early pushing-most benefits women with epidurals during second-stage labor. MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Database. Studies limited to randomized controlled trials in English, comparing passive descent to early pushing in women with effective epidural analgesia. A hand search was performed. Data included number of instrument-assisted deliveries (forceps and vacuum); noninstrumental or spontaneous vaginal births, cesarean births, pushing time, episiotomies, lacerations; maternal fatigue; and fetal well-being. Seven studies were eligible for a sample size of 2,827 women. Pooled data indicate that passive descent increases a woman's chance of having a spontaneous vaginal birth (relative risk: 1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.15; p = 0.025), decreases risk of having an instrument-assisted deliveries (relative risk: 0.77; 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.85; p < or = 0.0001), and decreases pushing time (mean difference: -0.19 hours; 95% confidence interval: -0.27 to -0.12; p < or = 0.0001). No differences were found in rates of cesarean births (relative risk: 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-1.12; p = 0.19), lacerations (relative risk: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.72-1.07; p = 0.20), or episiotomies (relative risk: 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.88-1.06; p = 0.45). Significant positive effects were found indicating that passive descent should be used during birth to safely and effectively increase spontaneous vaginal births, decrease instrument-assisted deliveries, and shorten pushing time.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051158145

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 18226152

DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2007.00205.x


Related references

Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor for nulliparous parturients with epidural analgesia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction 34(5): 440-447, 2005

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. The PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 182(5): 1165-1172, 2000

Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 182(5): 1165-1172, 2000

Comparison of delayed versus immediate pushing during second stage of labor for nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia. Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 39(6): 635-644, 2010

Active Pushing Versus Passive Fetal Descent in the Second Stage of Labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology 99(1): 29-34, 2002

Immediate and delayed pushing in the second stage of labour for nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: A randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 105(2): 186-188, 1998

Delayed versus Early Pushing in Women with Epidural Analgesia: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstetric Anesthesia Digest 25(3): 130-131, 2005

Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bjog 111(12): 1333-1340, 2004

Programmed intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia: the effects on maternal motor function and labor outcome. A randomized double-blind study in nulliparous women. Anesthesia and Analgesia 113(4): 826-831, 2011

Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Versus Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia: The Effects on Maternal Motor Function and Labor Outcome. A Randomized Double-Blind Study in Nulliparous Women. Yearbook of Anesthesiology and Pain Management 2012: 286-287, 2012

Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology 99(1): 29-34, 2002

Cesarean delivery: a randomized trial of epidural analgesia versus intravenous meperidine analgesia during labor in nulliparous women. Anesthesiology 96(3): 546-551, 2002

When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia. Yearbook of Anesthesiology and Pain Management 2010: 286-287, 2010

When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 201(4): 361.E1, 2009

Does epidural versus combined spinal-epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase the risk of instrumental and cesarean delivery in nulliparous women?. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 21(2): 94-97, 2009