+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A novel method to enhance informed consent: a prospective and randomised trial of form-based versus electronic assisted informed consent in paediatric endoscopy

A novel method to enhance informed consent: a prospective and randomised trial of form-based versus electronic assisted informed consent in paediatric endoscopy

Journal of Medical Ethics 37(4): 194-200

To evaluate the adequacy of paediatric informed consent and its augmentation by a supplemental computer-based module in paediatric endoscopy. The Consent-20 instrument was developed and piloted on 47 subjects. Subsequently, parents of 101 children undergoing first-time, diagnostic upper endoscopy performed under moderate IV sedation were prospectively and consecutively, blinded, randomised and enrolled into two groups that received either standard form-based informed consent or standard form-based informed consent plus a commercial (Emmi Solutions, Inc, Chicago, Il), sixth grade level, interactive learning module (electronic assisted consent). Anonymously and electronically, the subjects' anxiety (State Trait Anxiety Inventory), satisfaction (Modified Group Health Association of America), number of questions asked, and attainment of informed consent were assessed (Consent-20). Statistics were calculated using t test, paired t test, and Mann Whitney tests. The ability to achieve informed consent, as measured by the new instrument, was 10% in the control form-based consent group and 33% in the electronic assisted consent group (p<0.0001). Electronically assisting form-based informed consent did not alter secondary outcome measures of subject satisfaction, anxiety or number of questions asked in a paediatric endoscopy unit. This study demonstrates the limitations of form-based informed consent methods for paediatric endoscopy. It also shows that even when necessary information was repeated electronically in a comprehensive and standardised video, informed consent as measured by our instrument was incompletely achieved. The supplemental information did, however, significantly improve understanding in a manner that did not negatively impact workflow, subject anxiety or subject satisfaction. Additional study of informed consent is required.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051197156

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21245476

DOI: 10.1136/jme.2010.037622

Related references

Informed consent in medical research. In routine practice the consent form is a request form and informed consent is informed choice. BMJ 314(7092): 1482-1483, 1997

Improving communication when seeking informed consent: a randomised controlled study of a computer-based method for providing information to prospective clinical trial participants. Medical Journal of Australia 192(7): 388-392, 2010

An audit of informed consent in gastroscopy: investigation of a hospital's informed consent procedure in endoscopy by assessing current practice. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology 17(7): 721-724, 2005

Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC). Trials 18(1): 327, 2018

Informed consent in clinical trials. Informed consent difficult in paediatric intensive care. BMJ 307(6917): 1495, 1993

Patient recall of complications and their risk based on method of informed consent: Original consent form versus the PREDICT (Patient refined expectations for deciding invasive cardiac treatments) tool. 2007

Video or verbal? A randomised trial of the informed consent process prior to endoscopy. New Zealand Medical Journal 132(1489): 57-68, 2019

Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 73(2): 141-149, 2016

The Informed Consent Process and the Use of the Exception to Informed Consent in the Clinical Trial of Diaspirin. Academic Emergency Medicine 6(12): 1203-1208, 1999

Towards a standardised informed consent procedure for live donor nephrectomy: the PRINCE (Process of Informed Consent Evaluation) project-study protocol for a nationwide prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 6(4): E010594, 2017

Modifying a standard industry clinical trial consent form improves patient information retention as part of the informed consent process. Academic Emergency Medicine 8(3): 246-252, 2001

Understood consent versus informed consent: a new paradigm for obtaining consent for pediatric research studies. Frontiers in Pediatrics 1: 38, 2014

Prospective randomised controlled trial on the role of patient information leaflets in obtaining informed consent. Anz Journal of Surgery 76(3): 139-141, 2006

What is the process of obtaining informed consent in a clinical trial? Is it ever justifiable to include someone in a clinical trial without prior informed consent from the individual?. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 8(3): 262-263, 2016

Standardized audiotape versus recorded consultation to enhance informed consent to a clinical trial in breast oncology. Psycho-Oncology 16(4): 371-376, 2006