+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the effects of continuous and pulsed ultrasound in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis



A randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing the effects of continuous and pulsed ultrasound in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis



PhysioTherapy Theory and Practice 28(2): 85-94



The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of continuous ultrasound (CUS) with pulsed ultrasound (PUS) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group study, 40 patients (10 losses) with CRS participated. Patients received either continuous or pulsed (1:9) 1 MHz ultrasound (US) using a US head of 1 cm2 at 1 W/cm2 and 0.5 W/cm2 for the maxillary and frontal sinuses, respectively. Treatment was performed in 10 sessions, 3 days per week, with US given every other day. The primary outcome measure was percent improvement in the Sinusitis Symptom Score. Measurements were taken before and after 10 treatment sessions. The patients were followed up monthly for 2 months. After treatment, both groups improved significantly on the Sinusitis Symptoms Score. Patients who received PUS had significantly decreased total symptom scores compared with patients receiving CUS (mean change 9.8 vs. 5.6, p = 0.049). The percent improvement in the Sinusitis Symptom Score between the PUS group (65.2 SD 23.1) and the CUS group (43.9 SD 40.7) was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). The effect size for each treatment was large; PUS: d = 3.92 and CUS: d = 1.93. Symptom improvement in both groups was similar at the 2-month follow-up. These results support the use of therapeutic US for CRS. This pilot study gives only marginal evidence to favor PUS over CUS.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051230190

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 21823980

DOI: 10.3109/09593985.2011.571751


Related references

A randomized clinical trial comparing pulsed ultrasound and erythromycin phonophoresis in the treatment of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. PhysioTherapy Theory and Practice 31(3): 166-172, 2016

Clinical effects of topical antifungal therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intranasal fluconazole. Excli Journal 15: 95-102, 2016

Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound for chronic patellar tendinopathy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Rheumatology 47(4): 467-471, 2008

Topical antifungal treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 113(6): 1122-1128, 2004

Origanum vulgare inhaler in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis, a double blind placebo controlled randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Biology and Biotechnology 3(3): 547-550, 2006

The effect of thyme honey nasal spray on chronic rhinosinusitis: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology 272(6): 1429-1435, 2015

Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing two anesthetic techniques for ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular puncture. Einstein 14(3): 305-310, 2016

Beneficial effects of the thymic hormone preparation thymostimulin in patients with defects in cell mediated immunity and chronic purulent rhinosinusitis a double blind cross over trial on improvements in monocyte polarization and clinical effects. Clinical & Experimental Immunology 80(3): 304-313, 1990

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of anti-IgE for chronic rhinosinusitis. Rhinology 48(3): 318-324, 2010

Sino nasal inhalation of isotonic versus hypertonic saline (6.0%) in CF patients with chronic rhinosinusitis - Results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Journal of Cystic Fibrosis 15(6): E57-E66, 2016

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of macrolide in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Laryngoscope 116(2): 189-193, 2006

A randomized, double-blind multicentre clinical trial comparing the efficacy of calcium dobesilate with placebo in the treatment of chronic venous disease. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 35(3): 358-365, 2007

A randomized, double-blind, prospective study comparing the efficacy of continuous versus pulsed radiofrequency in the treatment of lumbar facet syndrome. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia 20(7): 534-537, 2008

Hormonal and metabolic stress responses after major surgery in children aged 0-3 years: a double-blind, randomized trial comparing the effects of continuous versus intermittent morphine. British Journal of Anaesthesia 87(3): 390-399, 2001