+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A retrospective comparison of four plate constructs for first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: static plate, static plate with lag screw, locked plate, and locked plate with lag screw



A retrospective comparison of four plate constructs for first metatarsophalangeal joint fusion: static plate, static plate with lag screw, locked plate, and locked plate with lag screw



Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 51(3): 285-287



The primary treatment for progressive first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthritis is arthrodesis. Multiple fixation types have been used to accomplish fusion including plating. There have been no published articles reporting the outcomes of these 4 plate and/or screw constructs. We present our experience with 138 first MTP joint fusions using these constructs. A retrospective comparison and radiographic chart review of 132 patients (138 feet) was performed to compare different constructs in regards to successful union and time to fusion. All operations were performed by 4 fellowship-trained foot and ankle surgeons. The radiographs were independently read by 2 authors not involved in the index procedures. Radiographic fusion was determined by bridging cortices across the joint line. The mean time to union (in days) and rate of fusion were static plate: 59, 95%, static plate with lag screw: 56, 86%, locked plate: 66, 92%, and locked plate with lag screw: 53, 96%. There was not a statistically significant difference between the groups in regards to patient age, time to weight bearing, time to fusion, or rate of fusion. We report on the results of fusion comparing 4 different plate and/or screw constructs for first MTP joint fusion. The data reveal no significant difference in time to fusion or rate of fusion between static and locked plates, with or without a lag screw.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051239513

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22459423

DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.02.006


Related references

In vivo comparison of screw versus plate and screw fixation for first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: does augmentation of internal compression screw fixation using a semi-tubular plate shorten time to clinical and radiologic fusion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ)?. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 47(1): 2-7, 2007

A retrospective comparison of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis using a locked plate and compression screw technique. Foot and Ankle Specialist 5(5): 289-292, 2013

A locking compression plate versus the gold-standard non-locking plate with lag screw for first metatarsophalangeal fusion: A biomechanical comparison. Foot 34: 69-73, 2018

A comparison of parallel and diverging screw angles in the stability of locked plate constructs. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 93(9): 1259-1264, 2011

Comparison of flexural and torsional stability in compression plate osteo synthesis using a plate lag screw a prevent plate or the combination of both techniques experimental studies in vitro. Langenbecks Archiv fuer Chirurgie 349(1): 527-528, 1979

An in vitro biomechanical comparison of dynamic condylar screw plate combined with a dorsal plate and double plate fixation of distal diaphyseal radial osteotomies in adult horses. Veterinary Surgery 38(6): 719-731, 2009

Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of the standard condylar buttress plate, a locked buttress plate, and the 95-degree blade plate. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 11(7): 521-524, 1997

Treatment of refracture in plate-screw fixation of femoral shaft with plate and xenogenic bony plate. Zhongguo Gu Shang 21(2): 111-112, 2009

Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 22(5): 312-316, 2008

Biomechanical comparison of a locking plate with intraplate compression screw versus locking plate with plantar interfragmentary screw for Lapidus arthrodesis: a cadaveric study. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 52(3): 339-342, 2014

Biomechanical Comparison of a Locking Plate with Intraplate Compression Screw Versus Locking Plate with Plantar Interfragmentary Screw for Lapidus Arthrodesis A Cadaveric Study. The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 52(3): 339-342, 2013

Finite element study of the stability of a femur plate osteosynthesis influence of the screw diameter and the screw plate connection. Journal of Biomechanics 22(10): 1081, 1989

The effect of an angle-stable plate-screw connection and various screw diameters on the stability of plate osteosynthesis. An FE model study. Der Unfallchirurg 93(12): 552-558, 1990

Internal fixation with a self-compressing plate and lag screw: improvements of the plate hole and screw design. 1. Mechanical investigation. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 5(3): 280-288, 1991

Internal fixation with a self-compressing plate and lag screw: improvements of the plate hole and screw design. 2. In vivo investigations. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 5(3): 289-296, 1991