+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data



A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data



Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 1(5): 441-451



BACKGROUND & SIGNIFICANCE: The AcademyHealth Electronic Data Methods Forum aims to advance the national dialogue on the use of electronic clinical data (ECD) for comparative effectiveness research (CER), patient-centered outcomes research, and quality improvement by facilitating exchange and collaboration among eleven research projects and external stakeholders. AcademyHealth conducted a mixed-method needs assessment with the Electronic Data Methods Forum's key stakeholders to assess: stakeholder views on developing new infrastructure for CER using ECD; current gaps in knowledge with respect to CER; and expectations for a learning health system. AcademyHealth conducted 50 stakeholder interviews between August 2011 and November 2011 with participants from the following seven stakeholder groups: government, business/payer, industry, healthcare delivery, patient/consumer, nonprofit/policy and research. With input from key collaborators, AcademyHealth designed a semi-structured interview guide and a short survey. Reviewers used the qualitative data analysis software NVivo to code the transcripts and to identify and manage complex concepts. Quantitative data from the questionnaire has been integrated with the final analysis as relevant. The analysis of recurring concepts in the interviews focus on five central themes: stakeholders have substantial expectations for CER using ECD, both with respect to addressing the limitations of traditional research studies, and generating meaningful evidence for decision-making and improving patient outcomes; stakeholders are aware of many challenges related to implementing CER with ECD, including the need to develop appropriate governance, assess and manage data quality, and develop methods to address confounding in observational data; stakeholders continue to struggle to define 'patient-centeredness' in CER using ECD, adding complexity to attaining this goal; stakeholders express that improving translation and dissemination of CER, and how research can be 'useful' at the point of care, can help mitigate negative perceptions of the CER 'brand'; and stakeholders perceive a need for a substantial 'culture shift' to facilitate collaborative science and new ways of conducting biomedical and outcomes research. Many stakeholders proposed approaches or solutions they felt might address the challenges identified.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051274045

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 24236421

DOI: 10.2217/cer.12.47


Related references

Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum building the infrastructure to conduct comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research using electronic clinical data. Medical Care 50 Suppl: Ii, 2012

Incorporating stakeholder perspectives in developing a translation table framework for comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 1(3): 281-292, 2014

Young adult and parent stakeholder perspectives on participation in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 5(5): 487-497, 2018

Data management in clinical research: Synthesizing stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 60: 286-293, 2017

Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S53-S57, 2013

Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum. Medical Care 50 Suppl: S11-S18, 2012

CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data. International Journal of Medical Informatics 84(10): 763-773, 2016

Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project. Egems 1(1): 1025, 2013

The Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum for comparative effectiveness research (CER). Medical Care 50 Suppl: S7-10, 2012

Using primary care electronic health record data for comparative effectiveness research: experience of data quality assessment and preprocessing in The Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 5(4): 345-354, 2018

Lessons from the Electronic Data Methods Forum: collaboration at the frontier of comparative effectiveness research, patient-centered outcomes research, and quality improvement. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S1-S3, 2013

Recommendations for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. Egems 1(1): 1018, 2013

Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S30-S37, 2013

Building electronic data infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research: accomplishments, lessons learned and future steps. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 3(6): 567-572, 2015

Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 4(5): 465-471, 2016