+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room

A universal global rating scale for the evaluation of technical skills in the operating room

American Journal of Surgery 193(5): 551

The ideal assessment of technical skills should be defensible and practical. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a Global Rating Scale (GRS) Assessment tool of resident operating room performance. Residents were assessed in the operating room on multiple occasions during a 6-month study period using a 9-item GRS. Data were analyzed to assess scale reliability and sensitivity to year of training. Feasibility was evaluated with a post-study questionnaire. Seven residents had a total of 32 procedures assessed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that scores increased with year of training (P = .009). Reliability was excellent. (Cronbach's alpha .91). The post-study survey identified feedback and faculty interaction as strengths of this tool, but time constraint was a barrier. The GRS tool is a valid and reliable method that has the potential to be a practical, useful assessment tool of resident operating room performance.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051282267

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 17434353

DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.003

Related references

Using the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) global rating scale to evaluate the skills of surgical trainees in the operating room. Surgery Today 43(3): 271-275, 2013

Objective structured assessment of nontechnical skills: Reliability of a global rating scale for the in-training assessment in the operating room. Surgery 157(6): 1002-1013, 2015

Surgeons' non-technical skills in the operating room: reliability testing of the NOTSS behavior rating system. World Journal of Surgery 32(4): 548-556, 2008

Assessment of Robotic Console Skills (ARCS): construct validity of a novel global rating scale for technical skills in robotically assisted surgery. Surgical Endoscopy 32(1): 526-535, 2018

Resident self-assessment versus faculty assessment of laparoscopic technical skills using a global rating scale. International Journal of Medical Education 1: 37-41, 2010

Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: a review of the literature. Surgery 139(2): 140-149, 2006

Assessing Nurse Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills in the operating room. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 58(7): 794-801, 2014

Can Residents Assess Other Providers' Infant Lumbar Puncture Skills?: Validity Evidence for a Global Rating Scale and Subcomponent Skills Checklist. Pediatric Emergency Care 33(2): 80-85, 2016

Assessment of Technical Skills Competence in the Operating Room: A Systematic and Scoping Review. Academic Medicine 93(5): 794-808, 2018

Customization of a tool to assess Danish surgeons´ non-technical skills in the operating room. Danish Medical Journal 59(11): A4526, 2012

Evaluation of the prototype Anaesthetic Non-technical Skills for Anaesthetic Practitioners (ANTS-AP) system: a behavioural rating system to assess the non-technical skills used by staff assisting the anaesthetist. Anaesthesia 70(8): 907-914, 2015

Coaching Non-technical Skills Improves Surgical Residents' Performance in a Simulated Operating Room. Journal of Surgical Education 72(6): 1124-1130, 2016

Psychomotor performance measured in a virtual environment correlates with technical skills in the operating room. Surgical Endoscopy 23(3): 645-649, 2009

Observation of behavioural markers of non-technical skills in the operating room and their relationship to intra-operative incidents. Surgeon 14(3): 119-128, 2016

Toward feasible, valid, and reliable video-based assessments of technical surgical skills in the operating room. Annals of Surgery 247(2): 372-379, 2008