+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project



Acceptance of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods by adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project



Contraception 84(5): 493-498



Adolescent women have a high risk of unintended pregnancy. Currently, there are little data about their choice to initiate long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). We evaluated the association of age and preference for a LARC vs. a non-LARC method among adolescent participants in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, comparing those aged 14-17 years to adolescents aged 18-20 years. We then analyzed the association between age and choice of the implant vs. the intrauterine device (IUD) among adolescents. Of the 5086 women enrolled, 70% (n=3557) of participants chose a LARC method. Among adolescents aged 14-20 years, 69% of 14-17-year-olds chose LARC, while 61% of 18-20-year-olds chose LARC (relative risk 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.30). Among adolescents choosing a LARC method, 63% (n=93/148) of the 14-17-year-olds chose the implant, whereas 71% (n=364/510) of the 18-20-year-olds chose the IUD. Long-acting reversible contraception use is clearly acceptable and common among adolescents enrolled in the Contraceptive CHOICE Project, with the younger group being most interested in the implant.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051321368

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22018123

DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.001


Related references

The Impact of Balanced Counseling on Contraceptive Method Choice and Determinants of Long Acting and Reversible Contraceptive Continuation in Nepal. Maternal and Child Health Journal 21(9): 1713-1723, 2017

The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 203(2): 115.E1-7, 2010

A Snapshot of Urban Adolescent Women's Contraceptive Knowledge at the Onset of a Community Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Promotion Initiative. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology 30(4): 474-478, 2017

Lessons from the contraceptive CHOICE project: the Hull long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) initiative. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 41(1): 60-63, 2015

Contraceptive failure of Depo-Provera: long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods do fail too. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 35(1): 59-60, 2009

Access to Removal of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods Is an Essential Component of High-Quality Contraceptive Care. Women's Health Issues 27(3): 253-255, 2017

Comparing contraceptive choices among postabortion patients with and without free access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods. Contraception 92(4): 385-386, 2015

Cost-Benefit Model of Varying Nexplanon and Other Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive (Larc) Methods: Uptake Compared to the Oral Contraceptive Pill: UK Perspective. Value in Health 17(7): A508, 2014

Effective, recommended, underutilized: a review of the literature on barriers to adolescent usage of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Current Opinion in Pediatrics 30(5): 683-688, 2018

Increasing the uptake of long-acting reversible contraception in general practice: the Australian Contraceptive ChOice pRoject (ACCORd) cluster randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open 6(10): E012491-E012491, 2016

Reducing barriers to the use of the intrauterine contraceptive device as a long acting reversible contraceptive. African Journal of Reproductive Health 18(4): 15-25, 2014

Effects of immediate postpartum contraceptive counseling on long-acting reversible contraceptive use in adolescents. Adolescent Health Medicine and Therapeutics 8: 115-123, 2017

Long-acting reversible contraceptive uptake before and after the Affordable Care Act contraceptive mandate among women undergoing first-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception 94(4): 412-413, 2016

Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive Uptake before and after the Affordable Care Act Contraceptive Mandate in Women Undergoing First Trimester Surgical Abortion. Women's Health Issues 28(4): 301-305, 2018

Factors predicting improper use of a woman-controlled long-acting reversible contraceptive: results from the acceptability study of a novel contraceptive vaginal ring. Contraception 96(4): 294-295, 2017