+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Application of a new three-dimensional method for the measurement of coronary stent angulation and comparison with conventional methods

Application of a new three-dimensional method for the measurement of coronary stent angulation and comparison with conventional methods

International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 29(4): 925-934

The precision of the measurement of the angulation of coronary stents or lesions using coronary angiography (CA) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) has not been established, and obtaining a rotating artery tree to measure angulation based on CTA is time-consuming. The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of a new three-dimensional centerline method that we have developed for the measurement of coronary stent angulation based on CTA and to compare it with other conventional methods. We used the centerline method compacted by means of our new software, the conventional artery rotation method based on CTA and the simple CA method to measure the angulations of phantoms in vitro and stents implanted in patients. The precision and repetition of this new method was compared with those of the other two methods. The angulation values obtained from both the centerline and artery rotation methods based on CTA had high correlation and agreement with the true angulation values measured using a phantom; the 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the differences were -0.67° to 0.91° and -0.59° to 2.93°, respectively, while the difference between the value determined using the CA method and the true angulation of the phantoms ranged from 3° to 21.8° (median 8.1°). In clinical coronary stent measurement, the difference between artery rotation and centerline measurement was small (95 % CI -9.0° to 7.6°), and both methods had good repeatability. The time required to complete the measurement was considerably shorter (p < 0.001) using the centerline method than artery rotation method (12.5 ± 1.86 vs. 71.8 ± 13.6 s), while the CA method had poor precision and repeatability in the measurement of clinical stent angulation relative to the methods based on CTA (95 % CI -14.7° to 21.7°). Our three-dimensional centerline method based on CTA for the measurement of angulation was reliable and easy to implement in both clinical and basic research image analysis, and the centerline and conventional artery rotation methods can be used interchangeably. In addition, the value obtained for the coronary stent angulation using the CA method had a large bias.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051607489

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 23179751

DOI: 10.1007/s10554-012-0157-7

Related references

Accurate measurement of mitral annular area by using single and biplane linear measurements: comparison of conventional methods with the three-dimensional planimetric method. European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging 13(7): 605-611, 2012

Immediate Change in Suprarenal Neck Angulation After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: Comparison of the Ovation Stent-Graft Inflatable Sealing Rings to a Conventional Self-Expanding Stent-Graft. Journal of Endovascular Therapy 22(4): 613-619, 2015

Assessing the accuracy and reliability of ultrasonographic three-dimensional parathyroid volume measurement in a patient with secondary hyperparathyroidism: a comparison with the two-dimensional conventional method. Ultrasonography 36(1): 17-24, 2017

Three-dimensional measurement of femoral antetorsion: comparison to a conventional radiological method. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 130(4): 513-518, 2010

Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type. International Journal of Dentistry 2018: 3761750, 2018

A randomized comparison of direct coronary stenting without angioplasty predilation and conventional stent implantation for acute coronary syndromes. European Heart Journal 20(ABSTR Suppl. ): 504, 1999

Comparison with conventional therapies of repeated sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis. American Journal of Cardiology 98(11): 1451-1454, 2006

Measurement accuracy of a computer-assisted three-dimensional analysis and a conventional two-dimensional method. Angle Orthodontist 81(3): 375-382, 2011

Evaluation of coronary artery stent patency by using 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography and conventional coronary angiography: a comparison with intravascular ultrasonography. International Journal of Cardiology 166(1): 90-95, 2013

Comparison of coronary flow velocity reserve measurement by transthoracic Doppler echocardiography with 320-row multidetector computed tomographic coronary angiography in the detection of in-stent restenosis in the three major coronary arteries. American Journal of Cardiology 110(1): 13-20, 2012

Evaluation of bacterial growth rate by the ATP-bioluminescence method (luciferase assay)--comparison with conventional methods and application to clinical studies. Hokkaido Journal of Medical Science 60(1): 125-133, 1985

Multislice spiral computed tomography for the evaluation of stent patency after left main coronary artery stenting: a comparison with conventional coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. Circulation 114(7): 645-653, 2006

Coronary Stent Graft JoStent versus conventional stent design in complex coronary lesions. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 33(2 Suppl. A): 36A, 1999

Three-dimensional analysis of the left anterior descending coronary artery: comparison with conventional coronary angiograms. Coronary Artery Disease 19(4): 265-270, 2008

Should we stent small coronary vessels? Comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty. European Heart Journal 18(ABSTR Suppl. ): 26, 1997