+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Application of a weights-of-evidence method and GIS to regional groundwater productivity potential mapping



Application of a weights-of-evidence method and GIS to regional groundwater productivity potential mapping



Journal of Environmental Management 96(1): 91-105



The aim of this study is to analyze the relationship among groundwater productivity data including specific capacity (SPC) and transmissivity (T) as well as its related hydrogeological factors in a bedrock aquifer, and subsequently, to produce the regional groundwater productivity potential (GPP) map for the area around Pohang City, Korea using a geographic information system (GIS) and a weights-of-evidence (WOE) model. All of the related factors, including topography, lineament, geology, forest, and soil data were collected and input into a spatial database. In addition, SPC and T data were collected from 83 and 81 well locations, respectively. Four dependent variables including SPC values of ≥6.25 m3/d/m (Case 1) and T values of ≥3.79 m2/d (Case 3) corresponding to a yield (Y) of ≥500 m3/d, and SPC values of ≥3.75 m3/d/m (Case 2) and T values of ≥2.61 m2/d (Case 4) corresponding to a Y of ≥300 m3/d were also input into a spatial database. The SPC and T data were randomly selected in an approximately 70:30 ratio to train and validate the WOE model. Tests of conditional independence were performed for the used factors. To assess the regional GPP for each dependent variable, W+ and W- of each factor's rating were overlaid spatially. The results of the analysis were validated using area under curve (AUC) analysis with the existing SPC and T data that were not used for the training of the model. The AUC of Cases 1, 2, 3 and 4 showed 0.7120, 0.6893, 0.6920, and 0.7098, respectively. In the case of the dependent variables, Case 1 had an accuracy of 71.20% (AUC: 0.7120), which is the best result produced in this analysis. Such information and the maps generated from it could be used for groundwater management, a practice related to groundwater resource exploration.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 051607815

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 22208402

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.09.016


Related references

Fuzzy weights of evidence method and its application in mineral potential mapping. Natural Resources Research 8(1): 27-35, 1999

Comparison of weights of evidence and decision-tree approaches to mapping regional mineral potential in northern New Brunswick. The = Canadian Conference on GIS,, 1992

Weighted weights of evidence and stepwise weights of evidence and their applications in Sn-Cu mineral potential mapping in Gejiu, Yunnan, China. Earth Science. Journal of China University of Geoscience 34.2, 2009

Regional groundwater productivity potential mapping using a geographic information system GIS based artificial neural network model. Hydrogeology Journal 20(8): 1511-1527, 2012

Regional-scale landslide susceptibility mapping using the weights of evidence method; an example applied to linear infrastructure. Revue Canadienne de Geotechnique 47.8, 2010

GIS-based groundwater spring potential mapping in the Sultan Mountains (Konya, Turkey) using frequency ratio, weights of evidence and logistic regression methods and their comparison. Journal of Hydrology 411(3-4): 290-308, 2011

Mapping of regional potential groundwater springs using Logistic Regression statistical method. Water Resources 43(1): 48-57, 2016

Groundwater productivity potential mapping using evidential belief function. Ground Water 52(Suppl. 1): 201-207, 2014

Weights of evidence modelling; a new approach to mapping mineral potential. Paper - Geological Survey of Canada Pages 171-183, 1990

A Hybrid Fuzzy Weights-of-Evidence Model for Mineral Potential Mapping. Natural Resources Research 15(1): 1-14, 2006

Mineral-Potential Mapping: A Comparison of Weights-of-Evidence and Fuzzy Methods. Natural Resources Research 15(1): 49-65, 2006

GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models. Science of the Total Environment 634: 853-867, 2018

GIS-based groundwater potential analysis using novel ensemble weights-of-evidence with logistic regression and functional tree models. Science of Total Environment 634: 853-867, 2018

Weights of evidence modeling and weighted logistic regression for mineral potential mapping. Studies in Mathematical Geology 5: 13-32, 1993

A Modified Weights-of-Evidence Method for Regional Mineral Resource Estimation. Natural Resources Research 20(2): 95-101, 2011